Wednesday 8th February 2012 | Last updated: Tuesday, 7 February 2012 at 16:52pm

Comment & Blogs

Why are the media so utterly hostile to the Pope?

The sneering vitriol heaped upon the Holy Father in advance of the visit in September has been staggering

By Milo Yiannopoulos on Thursday, 22 July 2010

Why are the media so utterly hostile to the Pope?

Times columnist Caitlin Moran seems to have escaped censure for her appalling remark about the Catholic Church

The sneering vitriol heaped upon the Holy Father and on Catholics in general by the metropolitan elites in advance of the papal visit in September has been little short of staggering. By now we are well acquainted with the apparent incompetence that has characterised the organisation of the trip, but that doesn’t explain why so many in the press seem to be baying for the Pope’s blood.

Back in March, eccentric Independent columnist Johann Hari wrote one of the most disingenuous pieces of journalism of his career – no mean feat – which, while effortlessly (and brutally) fisked by better-informed commentators, succeeded in convincing those already eager to believe that Pope Benedict XVI was personally culpable for covering up child abuse that “there must be something in it”.

Where his piece was not outright wrong it was laced with distortions and misrepresentations. He wrote: “It is now an indisputable fact that the Catholic Church systematically covered up the rape of children across the globe, and knowingly, consciously put paedophiles in charge of more kids. Joseph Ratzinger – who claims to be “infallible” – was at the heart of this policy for decades.”

What many have suspected as a pernicious anti-Catholic bias at the Times was apparently confirmed when columnist Caitlin Moran tweeted that the Catholic Church “hate[s] women and ****[s] kids” to her 29,000 followers. It was an appalling remark that seems to have attracted no censure from her bosses. (She apparently has no intention of deleting it: at the time of writing, it remains published and in Google’s index.) Who knows what’s going on behind the Times’s paywall? (No one I know has stumped up for it so I couldn’t check.)

Broadcast media have been even worse. Talk about a hate campaign: every dirty trick in the book has been employed to discredit and ridicule Benedict XVI. Just look at what the BBC is planning: a drama called The Pope on Trial, “a 90-minute drama which will take as its premise what would happen if the Pope were to go on trial for covering up sex abuse perpetrated by priests”.

And there are hints, most notably in Damian Thompson’s latest piece for the Spectator, that the British media are storing up something particularly juicy to deploy as Pope Benedict XVI’s plane lands.

All of which begs the question: why?

The Church isn’t really helping the PR operation, with hilariously bad promotional materials for the visit: the official booklet, for example, which looks as though it might have been knocked up by a seven-year-old armed with Microsoft Publisher 97, not to mention the hideous 70s-style parish banners surfacing at the moment. The literature seems to be more concerned with the Vatican’s “green credentials” than, say, the significance of the Pope’s trip for British Catholics.

But why the extraordinary campaign – one might even say conspiracy – to discredit the Church? Surely it cannot be fully explained by the child abuse crisis. What is going on?

  • EditorCT

    Well, musicmum, don't say “no” in the poll on the CT website asking if Caitlin Whatshername should be censured. Vote YES! http://www.catholictruthscotland.com/papalvisit…

    It's absolutely disgraceful that such comments have gone unchecked, whereas, and I know we all know this by now, if she'd been similarly insulting about a leader of, say Islam, she'd probably have been sacked.

  • EditorCT

    Pimpoo, if you can't see the truth in Cailin's comment, You need to see an optician…

  • Ratbag

    This is where wearing a cross could cost you your job. Where the mere intention of praying for someone is regarded in the same way as an obscene gesture. Where an individual too bladdered with cheap booze and very little in the brain department urinates on a war memorial dedicated to selfless men and women who died for our tomorrows, including theirs! Where a middle aged woman can first stroke an innocent cat then coldly take it by the scruff of the neck and dump it in a wheelie bin to world revulsion; where the same thing happens to aborted babies every day and nobody is allowed to see it on the evening news. Where Catholic adoption agencies are forced to close because what the previous Government signed into law was against the agency's conscience and faith – by not allowing same-sex couples to adopt children. Where the kind of things that are said against the Roman Catholic Church cross the threshold of journalistic balance and impartiality too, too far and – if it was said about anyone else in similar tones – would find the Press Complaints Commission, legal writs and the High Court breaking down the door of those responsible followed a published, public apology.

    Welcome, Holy Father.

  • Ratbag

    Looking at that picture, it's like Caitlin Moran is separated at birth from Cruella De Ville.

  • Ratbag

    The Church is busy out there in the poorest countries feeding the poor, dressing the wounded, nursing the sick (especially those who have HIV AIDS and other diseases), counselling those who have been hurt by abortion, divorce, bereavement and desertion as well as to the lonely, neglected and marginalised in our neighbourhoods. Successive popes have enabled many organisations to do these good things by approving the constitutions of religious and lay orders to go out there in the world as well as into our neighbourhoods. They are miracles of the kind you and Richard Dawkins et all will either refuse to understand or, quite simply, NEVER.

    God is content with the small things we do with great kindness, not the other way round.

    The devil tempted Jesus in the desert with similarly expressed tasks you are challenging the Pope to do. Christ told the devil to go away in no uncertain terms. The Pope is not Christ but his Vicar on earth.

  • Josarareed

    which catergory do you fit into?

  • Rondog

    There is one other answer…some months on, it appears that Caitlin Moran’s tweet was a succinct and pretty accurate summary of the situation. Tens of thousands of abused children and a papal cover up. Cailin’s reference to the state of sin of those who criticise the catholic church is a clear sign of delusion. I support Pimpoo’s recommendation; you should consult a psychiatrist.

  • Rondog

    Perhaps you should read a little about the activities of the Catholic superstar Mother Theresa? She consorted with vicious dictators, took money from convicted criminals and hoarded cash rather than invest it in facilities for the people she claims to care for. Why? Because her brand of religious delusion regards poverty and suffering as crucial to salvation. It would be hard to imagine amore wicked, poisonous human being.

Most Popular

Multimedia

Twitter Feed

Follow us on Twitter!