Washing your hands may affect your moral judgment
A new study has interesting implications for how external gestures affect our state of mind
By Quentin de la Bedoyere on Tuesday, 31 August 2010

People who have just washed their hands are likely to be harsher moral judges on matters such as pornography and littering (Photo: PA)
Pontius Pilate got his timing wrong. He should have washed his hands before releasing Jesus to his enemies – not after.
An interesting recent study in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology tells us that subjects who had been asked to wash their hands, apparently for incidental reasons, made significantly harsher moral judgments when later completing an evaluation questionnaire on subjects such as pornography or littering. Complementary studies, which followed, gave the same results.
We infer that our sense of being externally clean affects our self image and so raises our moral disapproval. No doubt Pilate got some relief from washing his hands afterwards but, had he done so before, he would have been more comfortable in the first place about handing over this renegade Jew.
What practical lessons do we learn about how our external, even ritual, gestures may affect our internal attitudes? My wife would speedily tell me if I ponged, but beyond that, I take washing rather lightly. As a result I am a benevolent and tolerant being – even if I now have to put it down to a lack of soap and water.
It certainly reinforces (and Pope Benedict agrees with me here) the importance of ritual in liturgy. The nominal washing at the Lavabo (most celebrants accept only a drop or two of water) would not be enough to make the priest intolerant but would, I expect, be enough to remind him of his share in moral frailty. The external action may make him open to inward repentance. (However other work, which I will not detail here, suggests that being in a position of power makes for moral hypocrisy; it may cancel out the Lavabo effect.)
And while I am on the subject, I believe that there should always be water, perhaps with mild disinfectant, and a towel, on the altar. Since many infections are passed by hand the priest with a cough or a cold may well be a locus of infection for a whole congregation receiving Communion. Plain charity requires this simple precaution.
Comment & Blogs
Washing your hands may affect your moral judgment
A new study has interesting implications for how external gestures affect our state of mind
By Quentin de la Bedoyere on Tuesday, 31 August 2010
People who have just washed their hands are likely to be harsher moral judges on matters such as pornography and littering (Photo: PA)
Pontius Pilate got his timing wrong. He should have washed his hands before releasing Jesus to his enemies – not after.
An interesting recent study in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology tells us that subjects who had been asked to wash their hands, apparently for incidental reasons, made significantly harsher moral judgments when later completing an evaluation questionnaire on subjects such as pornography or littering. Complementary studies, which followed, gave the same results.
We infer that our sense of being externally clean affects our self image and so raises our moral disapproval. No doubt Pilate got some relief from washing his hands afterwards but, had he done so before, he would have been more comfortable in the first place about handing over this renegade Jew.
What practical lessons do we learn about how our external, even ritual, gestures may affect our internal attitudes? My wife would speedily tell me if I ponged, but beyond that, I take washing rather lightly. As a result I am a benevolent and tolerant being – even if I now have to put it down to a lack of soap and water.
It certainly reinforces (and Pope Benedict agrees with me here) the importance of ritual in liturgy. The nominal washing at the Lavabo (most celebrants accept only a drop or two of water) would not be enough to make the priest intolerant but would, I expect, be enough to remind him of his share in moral frailty. The external action may make him open to inward repentance. (However other work, which I will not detail here, suggests that being in a position of power makes for moral hypocrisy; it may cancel out the Lavabo effect.)
And while I am on the subject, I believe that there should always be water, perhaps with mild disinfectant, and a towel, on the altar. Since many infections are passed by hand the priest with a cough or a cold may well be a locus of infection for a whole congregation receiving Communion. Plain charity requires this simple precaution.
In This Article
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Lavabo, Pontius Pilate, washingShare
About the author
Quentin de la Bedoyere
Contact the author
Related Posts
Most Popular
Our Bloggers
Anna Arco
Luke Coppen
William Oddie
Edward Pentin
Francis Phillips
Fr Alexander Lucie-Smith
Popular Tags
abortion Angelus Anglicanorum coetibus Archbishop Antonio Mennini Archbishop Bernard Longley Archbishop Timothy Dolan Archbishop Vincent Nichols BBC beatification Bishops' Conference of England and Wales clerical abuse crisis Cofton Park Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith David Cameron Dr Rowan Williams Dylan Parry Extraordinary Form Fr Federico Lombardi Fr Robert Barron general audience George Weigel Ireland Islam John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II beatification L'Osservatore Romano Middle East Christians new Mass translation ordinariate Pakistan Papal Visit 2010 Papal visit to Germany Personal Ordinariate Personal Ordinariate of Our Lady of Walsingham Pope Benedict XVI Pope John Paul II pro-life Rocco Palmo SSPX Vatican Westminster Cathedral World Youth Day WYD 2011 ZenitMultimedia
Syndicated from Rome Reports
Twitter Feed
Follow us on Twitter!
Copyright © Catholic Herald 2010. Registered in England and Wales, no. 9123451. Registered office: 15 Lamb's Passage, London EC1Y 8TQ.