Comment & Blogs
-
paulpriest
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_6B7TVQBY5SM3GRLFFJ3EJT5YFY Mary C
-
Brencel
-
Cjkeeffe
Copyright © Catholic Herald 2013. Registered in England and Wales, no. 9123451. Registered office: 15 Lamb's Passage, London EC1Y 8TQ. website by freshSPRING



Debate: Does the next Pope need to be a CEO who can reform the Curia?
Or should the priority instead be on holiness and authoritative teaching?
By The Catholic Herald on Friday, 19 November 2010
In This Article
Cathy Lynn Grossman, George Weigel, John Allen Jr, papacy, Pope Benedict XVI, Roman CuriaShare
About the author
The Catholic Herald
The Catholic Herald is a Catholic newspaper based in London. It was founded in 1888.
Contact the author
Related Posts
Does the papacy need a ruthless manager? (Photo: CNS)
This week two heavyweight Church commentators said Pope Benedict XVI had failed to reform the Curia. George Weigel and John Allen, according to USA Today, argued that his neglecting of this crucial task had undermined his pontificate.
They made the comments at a conference for journalists in Washington, and they were picked up by USA Today columnist Cathy Lynn Grossman, who said:
According to Weigel, “the single biggest management problem” in the Church today is the inability to sack bad bishops. People expected Pope Benedict to be a managerial Rottweiler and he hasn’t been.
Both commentators, according to Cathy Lynn Grossman, said that the Pope has deferred the crucial task of reforming the Curia to his successor.
When the time comes to choose the next Pope, they apparently said:
Are they right – does the Church need a slick CEO? Or would a CEO-type be too worldly, too concerned with management and PR at the expense of eternal truths? A corporate, American-style system might go down rather badly with a predominantly Italian workforce, too.
So, should the next Pope be a CEO who can reform the Curia? Or should the priority instead be on holiness and authoritative teaching?