Comment & Blogs
- http://www.facebook.com/people/Ken-Purdie/1162381995 Ken Purdie
- Workshed
- Adam Thomson
- Adam Thomson
- Tim Tindal-Robertson
- Anonymous
- Jeannine
- jng
- An ordinary working class man
- David Armitage
- Anonymous
- Anonymous
- Anonymous
- Mazzalfa
Through prayer, the Holy Spirit can help people overcome their weaknesses, Benedict XVI says at general audience
Copyright © Catholic Herald 2012. Registered in England and Wales, no. 9123451. Registered office: 15 Lamb's Passage, London EC1Y 8TQ. served by freshSPRING



Let’s take a principled stand against the BBC’s euthanasia propaganda
The Corporation has betrayed its charter and is no longer worthy of receiving our licence fee
By Francis Phillips on Thursday, 16 June 2011
In This Article
Charles Moore, Dr Peter Saunders, Jonathan Ross, Margo MacDonald, Patrick Stewart, Phyllis Bowman, Right To Life, Russell Brand, Terry Pratchett’Share
About the author
Francis Phillips
Francis Phillips reviews books for the Catholic Herald.
Contact the author
Related Posts
BBC's Television Centre in London (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)
Since I wrote my last blog about the BBC bias evident in Sir Terry Pratchett’s programme about assisted suicide on BBC Two on Monday night, I have received Phyllis Bowman’s Right to Life newsletter in the post this morning. Bearing in mind that it was written before the BBC Two programme on Monday, this is what she writes, under the subheading “The Biggest UK Pro-Euthanasia Lobby – The BBC”:
Phyllis Bowman reminds readers of her newsletter to protest to the BBC complaints, PO Box 1922, Glasgow G2 3WT or to write to the new Chairman of the Board of Governors, the Right Hon Lord Patten of Barnes, Chairman, BBC Trust, Room 14, London Broadcasting House, Portland Place, London W1 1AA. Both he and the Director General of the BBC, Mark Thompson, are Catholics, incidentally.
Phyllis also draws attention to a survey conducted by SCOPE, the leading disability charity which found that 70 per cent of disabled people feared that a reform of the law on assisted suicide would create pressure on vulnerable patients to “end their lives prematurely”. Richard Hawkes, chief executive of SCOPE, is quoted as saying: “While high-profile lawyers, doctors and celebrities such as Terry Pratchett and Patrick Stewart grab the headlines, the views of the thousands of ordinary disabled people who could be affected by this issue are rarely listened to.”
To me, it seems as if the BBC is and will remain impervious to complaints on this issue. I cannot see that writing letters will make it do more than give token coverage to the voices opposed to euthanasia, perhaps throwing in an urbane “explanation” of its enlightened policy as a sop to religious “bigots”. But suppose Catholics and other Christians, indeed anyone concerned about the demonstrable partiality of our “impartial” broadcasting service, were to decide to withhold their licence fee? Money speaks louder than words. If thousands were prepared to do it, they simply could not all be taken to court.
Journalist and biographer Charles Moore took just such a principled stand over the BBC’s refusal to sack Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand for the obscene and insulting messages they left on the answer phone of actor Andrew Sachs and which were broadcast in a nine-minute sequence on Radio 2 in October 2008. Overall the BBC received 25,000 complaints about this incident. The result? Charles Moore was taken to court and fined £262 plus costs, while Ross was suspended for a mere three months. Brand chose to resign from his own show.
Important though Moore’s stand was, this is a much more serious, indeed life-threatening matter than making a protest over nasty jokes. It has never happened before that a huge number of people have said to the BBC in effect: “You have betrayed your Charter long enough. We won’t pay the licence fee again until you agree to impartial broadcasting of moral and ethical issues.”