Mon 21st Apr 2014 | Last updated: Sun 20th Apr 2014 at 22:21pm

Facebook Logo Twitter Logo RSS Logo
Hot Topics

Comment & Blogs

The battle on abortion should not be about incremental gains in Parliament

Pro-lifers should start by saying that abortion is intrinsically evil and fight on that principle

By on Monday, 19 September 2011

A Pro-life Day with Mary could be organised annually (Photo: Mazur/catholicchurch.org.uk)

A Pro-life Day with Mary could be organised annually (Photo: Mazur/catholicchurch.org.uk)

I am very much hoping that the parish priest of the parish “not a million miles from where I live” did not read my last blog about hymn singing and the merits or demerits of Kevin Mayhew’s hymnal compared with that compiled by the London Oratorians. I say this because, by a strange coincidence, we did sing Faith of Our Fathers yesterday at Mass (which will please “leprechaun himself” who posted about it). I am also grateful to Parasum who enlightened me about the translation of “bonae voluntatis”. I still prefer “Fathers” to the suggested “forbears” which, though gender-correct and scanning, lacks the personal warmth and other connotations (such as the phrase “Fathers of the Church”) denoted by the word “Fathers”. And I am sure the magnificent St Margaret Clitherow would not have been bothered about it.

Anyway, this blog is not intended to be about sexism in the wording of hymns. It is about the pro-life issue (again). As people know, the third stanza of Fr Faber’s great hymn runs: “Faith of our Fathers Mary’s prayers/ Shall win our country back to Thee/ and through the truth that comes from God/England shall then indeed be free.” As I sang it I began to think, “This is all pious pie in the sky stuff. Look at the annual abortion toll in this country. Our Lady must be weeping about it – but there is nothing she can do. We are lost.”

This is, of course, a counsel of despair that sometimes distracts one during Mass (which is the supreme enactment of the counsel of hope). Then I sternly told myself to chuck the gloom; “Mary’s prayers” are the most powerful prayers of all, and of course she can win – if we turn to her in the right way. This led my thoughts to a recent blog of Damian Thompson concerning the Dorries amendment, in which he candidly explained the destructive and uncharitable in-fighting that goes on between X, Y and Z in the pro-life movement. This is itself a scandal that must cry to heaven.

Having given support to Spuc, Life, the Right to Life and other pro-life bodies in the past, I now support the Good Counsel Network as it strikes me as the most prayerful and the most Catholic of all the pro-life groups. I do not mean to be critical of the others, who all do good work; but although this abortion issue must be fought out in Parliament it has to be more than a political issue where one tries for incremental gains, small victories, employs strategies and the like. Yes, we all need to pray to Our Lady: but I can’t believe that she would sanction the incremental approach, ie saving some babies at the expense of others, or fixing a time limit on when abortions can or cannot take place.

Pro-lifers often cite, in their own defence, the example of the abolitionists of the slave trade, saying it took Wilberforce 20 years to win the abolition of the infamous and hugely prosperous slave trade. Someone correct me if I am wrong, but I think that Wilberforce and his friends did not go for incremental gains – saving the lives of some slaves but not others – in his long struggle for abolition. He showed the public pictures of the appalling slave ships together with a chained black slave (with the caption “Am I not your brother?”) and declared that slavery should be abolished because it was intrinsically evil. By this analogy we pro-lifers must start by saying that abortion is intrinsically evil and fight politically on that principle.

Back to “Mary’s prayers”: if this isn’t already done, why don’t all the pro-life groups get together for an annual “Pro-Life Day with Mary”? This would be different from the broad Day for Life established in the dioceses by the bishops some years ago and also from the usual “Days with Mary” that are popular up and down the country. It would be an annual event specifically for all the pro-life groups and their supporters, Christian or not; when all these individual and splinter groups bury their grievances and mutual suspicions for a whole day, to pray together under the aegis of Our Lady.

The day could involve Confession (very important), the Rosary, singing Marian hymns, as well as Mass and Benediction. I would be against “focus group” discussions on an occasion like this; the whole emphasis should be on prayer, contrition for past in-fighting, and openness to what Our Lady directs. It should take place in London, the seat of Parliament, and could include a procession around Parliament Square, holding banners of Our Lady of Guadalupe, patroness of the unborn.

What do you think?

  • Oconnordamien

    Much though I might agree or disagree. The simple reality is that loads of people are doing it. Literal and beautiful though your point may be, does it work in the real world today. Will anything you say stop a girl getting pregnant?

    It boils down to my point again, I tried to offer a real solution to reduce abortions, while you did not. 

  • Oconnordamien

    Get over Croatia. Last stats I read they had a 15 in 1000 rate now. 

    It’s a bit cheeky for you to ask me for evidence after the the claims you make here all the time. 
    I kid you not, check my “claims” against yours on other subjects. 
    I think you might be falling into a dawkins and getting delusional.

  • Maryp

    More things are wrought by prayer than this world ever dreamt of – good idea Francis. 

  • Anonymous

    @Oconnordamien In reply to “Much though I might agree or disagree’.
    What I have put forward is not a complete solution. I was trying to show in that posting that contraception is an inherently immoral solution.
    An inherently immoral solution cannot be a real solution because it contradicts what is good for human persons, what is according to human dignity. In the specific case, using contraception involves contradicting the truth of conjugal acts and, if done with full knowledge, therefore involves deception and lying, which demean the human person.
    You yourself have put forward part of the answer when you wrote about children being taught to respect their own bodies (which I would adjust to say “respect themselves” because we are talking about whole persons here, not just about bodies, but maybe you meant that anyway). The answer lies in positive education in the meaning of human sexuality within the family, not a technological solution but a moral solution.