Fri 24th Oct 2014 | Last updated: Thu 23rd Oct 2014 at 16:14pm

Facebook Logo Twitter Logo RSS Logo
Hot Topics

Comment & Blogs

The era when just being Catholic was a crime

Merely speaking about the Eucharist landed you in court under Elizabeth I, says Ed West

By on Monday, 10 September 2012

The Time Traveller’s Guide to Elizabethan England
By Ian Mortimer
Bodley Head,

‘They fastened the bar with a pin to prevent it slipping, and then, removing the wicker steps one by one from beneath my feet, they left me hanging by my hands and arms fastened above my head. The tops of my toes, however, still touch the ground and they had to dig away the earth from under them.” So wrote Fr John Gerard, a Catholic priest taken to the Tower of London in 1597, when he had suffered the seven types of tortures used on priests, including the pit, the rack and the “Scavenger’s Daughter”, an iron ring that forced heads, hands and feet together.

The situation for England’s Cath-olics had steadily deteriorated after Henry VIII’s younger daughter ascended the throne in 1558, as Ian Mortimer illustrates in this social snapshot of the late 16th century. Mortimer, perhaps Britain’s most renowned historian of the late medieval period, scored a hit with a similar look at 14th-century England, but the sequel, naturally, places more emphasis on religion.

The early years of Elizabeth saw the last of the whitewashes, finishing the cultural destruction initiated by Thomas Cromwell under her father’s reign. It was not until January 1564, the author notes, that John Shakespeare paid workmen to obliterate the Day of Judgment images in Stratford church.

Anti-Catholic hostility steadily grew, inflamed by the Pope’s declarations against Queen Elizabeth. In 1571, Parliament passed a new Act making it high treason to claim the Queen was “a heretic, schismatic, tyrant, infidel or usurper”. It became illegal to import papal bulls, crucifixes or rosary beads.

Just as in later secular regimes where the old religion was suppressed, ordinary people could end up in serious trouble if they said the wrong things. Essex tailors George and William Binkers were hauled before magistrates in 1577 for saying that the Host became “the very body, flesh and blood of Christ”. John Howard was brought to court for stating that “it was never merry in England since the scriptures were so commonly preached and talked upon”.

The situation intensified in 1580, when scholars from Douai set up an illegal printing press in Oxfordshire and 100 Jesuits arrived with the mission “to preserve and augment the faith of the Catholics in England”. From then on anyone trying to persuade people to join the Catholic Church was guilty of high treason and executed, and anyone missing an Anglican service was to be fined £20 per month.

After 1593, Catholics could travel no more than five miles from home without forfeiting all property and had to register with local authorities and obtain a licence if they wished to go anywhere. Things had changed a lot since 1564, when half of all justices of the peace had hesitated to swear Oath of Supremacy.

The harshness of Catholic lives was particular, but not exceptional, for this was a violent and hard age. In the decade John Shakespeare’s son William was born, the town of Stratford baptised 63 children and buried 43. Because of this former figure the country’s population was finally recovering back to the levels it had enjoyed before the Black Death.

London, for the first time, became an important place, the population rising from 70,000 to 200,000 in the Queen’s reign. This had brought problems, illustrated by Mortimer’s sketches from court reports, diaries and other contemporary accounts, of a place where “the poor lie in the streets upon pallets of straw … [and] are suffered to die in the streets like dogs or beast without any mercy or compassion”.

The number of paupers on the streets mushroomed and Parliament passed increasingly harsh and cruel laws until it settled on the 1597 Relief of the Poor Act which, however tough, lasted for 237 years. Care for the poor was now paid for out of tax – secular responsibility taking over from a traditional religious role.
There were famines from 1594-7, while far more died from influenza, the strain of 1558-1559 killing five per cent of the population (compared to 0.5 per cent in 1918-1919). Malaria was also widespread in East Anglia, but far worse in Romney Marsh in Kent, a notorious child’s graveyard where a third did not see their fourth birthdays.

Fate is cruel, and so are men. At the south end gatehouse on London Bridge, one would see 30 or so skulls rotting away in various states of decomposition. Capital punishment was inflicted liberally and torture was common, such that “some of the extreme cruelty that we usually associate with the medieval world is in reality more common in Elizabeth’s reign”. But although Henry VIII introduced boiling alive as a punishment for poisoning, Elizabeth abolished it. Expressing conspiracy theories was a capital offence, while those, like Margaret Clitherow, who refused to testify were crushed under eight hundredweights of stone.

Men were legally allowed to beat “an outlaw, a traitor, a pagan, his villein and his wife”, but education had become the norm for upper-class women, so that Lady Jane Grey, for instance, spoke Greek, Latin, Hebrew, French and Italian by the time of her death, aged just 16. And things are improving: many of England’s most famous schools were established in their period, including Shrewsbury, Rugby and Harrow. William Harrison notes that every town in England has a grammar school by the end of Elizabeth’s reign.

Male literacy increased from about 10 per cent in 1500 to 25 per cent in 1600, while book production rose from 1605 titles in the 1550s to 4040 in the 1600s.

The written word galvanised the Puritans, who remained a threat until 1593, when the “middle way” for English religion was buttressed by Richard Hooker’s Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity, by which time the Elizabethan cultural revolution had established the Anglican domination that would last until the 20th century.

Fr Gerard, incidentally, stood firm. “The Lord saw my weakness with the eyes of His mercy,” he said, “and did not permit me to be tempted beyond my strength.”

  • James

    I was under the impression that Shakespeare’s father was a recusant, a faithful Catholic. Did they not find his will which was made out in the formula introduced by St Edmund Campion and Jesuits, professing his faith?  I seem to remember an article on that not long ago.  I am surprised to hear that he paid to have a fresco whitewashed.  Any thoughts anyone?

  • AnthonyPatrick

     In ‘Saints, Scarilege & Sedition’ Professor Eamon Duffy explains the background “against which we should read John Shakespeare’s involvement” in the whitewashing:

         “Stratford, like other conservative towns, was slow to implement the [1559 Elizabethan] injunction… three years into the Settlement, the corpration eventually got round to the removal of the rood loft and other images… it is the tardiness of this action which strikes us, together with the fact that the Stratford purges of 1562 and 1571 were almost certainly a response to external prodding rather than spontaneous zeal.”

    Professor Duffy also points out that during his tenure as chief alderman in 1571, John Shakespeare was “therefore deputy to the protestant bailiff Adrien Queny, when the latter secured the corporation’s agreement to sell off the parish’s Catholic vestments”.

    ['Saints, Sacrilege & Sedition', Bloomsbury, 2012]

  • CatholicBlogger

    This book can be purchased (hard-back) from Amazon for £13.20 today, but prices do vary by using the following link:

    This is with FREE DELIVERY

  • theroadmaster

    The imposition of the protestant Henrician settlement from above and the subsequent violent suppression of the Catholic religion, revealed that the newly minted state religion was anything but a spontaneous grassroots movement that grew out of a so-called disenchantment with the Old Religion. The invaluable research in recent decades carried by very well-respected historians like Eamonn Duffy in relation to the turbulent Reformation era in Britain, is contributing to a more nuanced and sympathetic depiction of the state of Catholicism in the late Medieval and Renaissance periods, in contrast to the unquestioned Whig myths of a compliant clergy and laity, ready to cast off 1000 years of Ecclesiastical history.

  • Charles

    English Catholics today have an inferiority and 2nd class citizen complex because of this history which is ironic since secular liberalism exalts victim-hood status in the form of minority rights. The truth is that Catholicism though suppressed in England for a long time, has survived under the most difficult circumstance and for that reason alone Catholics should be proud of their toughness and resilience. It is time to take back what was lost and start demanding that the church of England return the stolen Cathedrals and churches and, in the very least, give us back access to having Mass in them.

  • South Saxon

    Five centuries ago, English Catholics risked their lives to bring the sacraments to the faithful. How sad that today many Catholics in England have walked away from the sacraments.