Mon 20th Oct 2014 | Last updated: Mon 20th Oct 2014 at 22:34pm

Facebook Logo Twitter Logo RSS Logo
Hot Topics

Comment & Blogs

Catholics today could see the birth of a new model of Church

The shedding of institutional structures and the diminishing number of priests could, in fact, be liberating

By on Monday, 10 December 2012

The Fathers of the Second Vatican Council could not have foreseen how the Church would change (Photo: CNS)

The Fathers of the Second Vatican Council could not have foreseen how the Church would change (Photo: CNS)

It is 50 years since the Vatican Council began, and everyone, it seems, has had something to say on the anniversary; what strikes me, rather belatedly, reading the documents again, just how the world has changed since 1962, in a way that the Council Fathers could not possibly have foreseen.

Let me count the ways.

First, back in 1962, the Catholic Church spoke, more or less, with one voice. Something like a papal encyclical, or, on a local level, a bishop’s pastoral letter, enjoyed a clear and open field, relatively free from competition. There simply was not then the vast unregulated river of comment that streams forth day and night from the internet, 24-hour television, and the press. Today, a papal encyclical still packs a considerable punch, but thousands of people, indeed millions, can now publish their opinions on religious matters, who could not in the past. This profusion of voces populi resembles the sort of anarchy that all those who wish to control freedom of expression must dread.

Now, of course, it has to be said that much of this commentary is of no enduring value, but some of it is. When the history of these times comes to be written, some of these voices will be heard still, and future generations will see early 21st-century Catholicism as pluralistic, not monolithic: a cacophony of discordant voices, not a choir all singing from the same hymn sheet. This is not the Church that the Council Fathers foresaw, or the documents of the Council presuppose.

Second, the Council Fathers imagined a dialogue with the world which now no longer seems possible. Once upon a time, Catholics could engage in discussions at official level with polite Marxists from the Eastern Bloc. That bloc no longer exists; indeed, most blocs have crumbled. While the Church may still want dialogue, there seem now to be few worthy partners. Few organised bodies seem interested in reasoned debate. Take the question of gay marriage and the farcical consultation on the same subject. The British Government itself has rejected dialogue with the Church, as Bishop Joseph Devine has pointed out.

As with David Cameron, so with Richard Dawkins, and so Bin Laden’s minions. I am not for a moment saying that all these people belong in the same category, but they all share one thing – they are not interested in talking to the Catholic Church.

Third, the tone of the Council documents, and their emphasis on a knowledge of the Bible, seen, for example, in the introduction of the new lectionary, indicate an expectation that there would be a new flowering of study and learning. Sadly, for reasons largely beyond the Church’s control, the 50 years since the Council have seen a return to the Dark Ages in education. Dumbing down across the board, most clearly evident in the abandonment of the classics in schools, has largely cut theology off from its sources. The decline, too, of a book culture has led to the Bible becoming less accessible to many. What was once the shared patrimony of humanity – the stories of the Bible – has now become the preserve of those who dwell in a cultural ghetto. This collapse in educational standards is something everyone should lament, but few do, preferring to deny that it has happened. Catholicism needs a high culture in which to flourish, and that high culture, in Europe at least, is withering. The Vatican Council was, in some senses, the last hurrah of a high culture that seemed healthy, but was in fact to be dealt its death blow in 1968. Vatican II was supposed to usher in a new age of Biblical knowledge. Instead, the Bible is now less known than it was 50 years ago.

This may sound pessimistic, and in a way it is. The Vatican II Fathers probably, if they thought of the future at all, thought of the Church continuing much as before. In the last 50 years, this has been the unspoken assumption – that the Catholic Church would continue, along the same model as it has since the reign of Blessed Pius IX. But this looks increasingly unlikely. It is more than possible – indeed it seems more or less certain – that the Church of the future is not going to be like the Church of the past. It is going to have to do without the huge number of priests and religious that it once considered normal; it is going to have to do without the institutional structures. But this shedding of an old skin, which may well be deeply painful, could in fact be liberating. We could be on the brink, at last, of seeing the birth of a new model of Church, one that the Council Fathers hoped for, but the exact form of which would have surprised them considerably.

  • Deodatus

    Indeed this is the hope – the prayer – but you point directly to the problem in the way.

  • Lazarus

    Do get off your high horse, Jonathan!

    The reason that you shouldn’t think me a hypocrite is that there is no pretence involved. Of course I change what I say and how I say it depending on what I’m trying to do and to whom I’m speaking. (Do you discuss theology with your milkman? Do you exchange algorithms with your lover?) But at no stage do I consciously pretend to beliefs that I don’t have.

    And if you doubt my motivations or think that I have slipped into pretence unintentionally, you can challenge me and I will explain them just as I have here.

  • Cjm1957

    Many Lay Catholics are studying the Bible and the reduction in clergy could be the work of the Holy Spirit, enabling the Laity to take their rightful place in carrying out their baptismal mission instead of being spectators at the feast and blindly following a hierarchical clergy. A return to small faith communities and the simplicity of the Mass described by St Justin, Martyr in the early Church long before the ‘Traditionalists’ wrecked things in the 16th century would be very welcome.

  • Benedict Carter

    How did the “Traditionalists” wreck things in the 16th Century? This should be an interesting exposition of total ignorance. 

  • Tom47

    “We could be on the brink, at last, of seeing the birth of a new model of Church,” 

    The documents of the Council certainly belong to a more trusting and optimistic age.The invitation to the world to enter into dialogue with the church in good faith has been overtaken by an aggressive secularism and the naive ecumenism of the sixties foundered whenever it has got down to fundamentals. But there is hope: the Pope’s elegant initiative in freezing the liturgical wars with Summorum Pontificum has opened the way in the longer term to a new liturgical initiative drawing on both forms of the mass.SOME IDEASIn future, the core of the church will be less  clerical (there will be fewer priests), and more committed and active than in the past, there will probably not be a penunmbra of non-practising ‘cultural Catholics’ as now, given the hostility in the culture.To avoid becoming self-satisfied and inward-looking we should offer blessings and and naming ceremonies for new-born babies, reserving infant baptism for the children of active members of the congregation. Similarly with Holy Communion and the mass: we could offer services of prayer and blessings for non-believers at Christmas and Easter (some German dioceses do this already and they are well-supported). We should give up most of our schools: what does the church get out of them? The money saved should go  (1) to materials and short courses fro adult formation, so that everyone could be expected to keep up to date on theology, the church’s teaching and apologetics; (2) spiritual programmes within parishes but also retreats, with every catholic expected to go on a retreat or follow a spiritual course  every couple of years.This would give the faithful spiritual and intellectual weapons to combat the secularist assumptions of the society.

    The parish should develop a social side to bind the members together, and home-visiting  teams should cover all disabled and sick members of he parish community The aim should be to visit daily.People will think ‘How these Catholics love one another!’