Sun 31st Aug 2014 | Last updated: Sun 31st Aug 2014 at 22:18pm

Facebook Logo Twitter Logo RSS Logo
Hot Topics

Features

Cathedral receives a glorious makeover

Mark Greaves visits Glasgow’s Catholic cathedral as workers toil to finish one of the most ambitious church renovation projects in years

By on Thursday, 7 April 2011

The Metropolitan Cathedral Church of St Andrew, pictured during the extensive renovations. Ronnie Convery says work will continue until ‘about five minutes’ before the re-opening Mass

The Metropolitan Cathedral Church of St Andrew, pictured during the extensive renovations. Ronnie Convery says work will continue until ‘about five minutes’ before the re-opening Mass

On February 22 2002, the day that Archbishop Mario Conti was installed as Archbishop of Glasgow, he thought: “Something has to be done about this cathedral.” It was, he says, looking rather tired. Now, nine years later, the Metropolitan Cathedral Church of St Andrew is about to re-open, having undergone the biggest renovation and redecoration in its 200-year history.

Partly, the work has been practical: the cathedral has new heating, new wiring, new lighting and a new floor. But its aesthetic makeover has been dramatic, too: it’s been re-painted; the font and altar have been replaced; an ambitious, large-scale piece of art is being installed. It is even getting a garden.

Its new look is very much down to Archbishop Conti. Most of the ideas are his; the altar he designed himself. He has enormous practical interest in art and architecture: as a seminarian in Rome he painted the set for a Gilbert and Sullivan musical.

He has been managing the project closely. According to Ronnie Convery, his director of communications, he would go up the scaffolding in a hard hat and, after inspecting some work, suggest a change to colour or design.

And he has only just managed to fit it all in: at 77, he is two years past retirement and the oldest Catholic bishop still holding office in Britain. He is likely to step down within months of the cathedral re-opening.
When I visit there is only a week to go. The pews are under plastic sheets; wires, foam and dust cover the floor. Workmen are busy drilling and sawing.

For a cathedral, it is tiny. It was Glasgow’s first post-Reformation Catholic church, built as a chapel in 1816. When it later gained the status of a cathedral its small structure was left unchanged. From the front, it has a view of the River Clyde; a few yards away on a side street is a lap-dancing club.

Pictures of the interior before the renovation show it looking tatty. In the 1970s the previous Archbishop of Glasgow, Cardinal Thomas Winning, had plans to build a new cathedral; he decided in the end to spend the money on social causes instead.

Archbishop Conti and Ronnie Convery have agreed to give me a tour. The cathedral is by no means ready: Convery says work will probably finish around five minutes before the opening hymn.

As we walk inside I am struck by how light it is. The stained glass absolutely gleams – each pane has been taken out and cleaned.

The centrepiece of the renovation – Peter Howson’s painting of the martyrdom of St John Ogilvie – is not yet in place. The work, which was completed last year, depicts the saint just as he is about to be hanged, with a noose around his neck. It is 10ft by 7ft and has apparently required the biggest framing project in Scotland for centuries.

Archbishop Conti explains that the saint, who was executed about 800 yards from the cathedral, is Scotland’s only Reformation martyr. “But a lot of people suffered for their faith,” he says softly. The archbishop has a gentle manner – at times I can barely hear him over the drilling and banging.

He talks about Scottish Catholic history. At one point, he says, Catholics were “pretty much wiped out” in Glasgow. He says that for many early immigrants, “this was the church”. (Archbishop Conti himself is from a pocket of north-eastern Scotland where the faith managed to survive – although, as you might guess from his name, his grandparents are all Italian.) He praises Fr Andrew Scott, who commissioned the building, and James Gillespie, the architect whose name is carved into the front archway: they wanted a church “worthy of its purpose”. In many ways, he says, the redecoration has been an attempt to “get closer” to Gillespie’s original vision.

We look up at the ceiling. Before, its decorative features were covered over in a dull grey. Now they are an exquisite gold, blue, red and green (over 3,000 books of gold leaf have been used). This, says Convery, was the archbishop’s idea.

Next we turn to the pillars. Before, they too were grey; now they are decorated with ribbons of blue and gold. They are plaster, but have been painted to look like stone. “I had to insist on this,” the archbishop explains, “because the architect [Justin Fenton] said it would look false.” He nudges my arm mischievously. “It was when the principal adviser to Historic Scotland came on my side that he buckled.”

We walk towards the centre of the church. The new altar, made out of white veined marble, is longer and more traditional than the old one, now fitted into the wall. I ask the archbishop where he got his inspiration. “From my head!” he says.

Behind us, at the centre of the nave, is a new baptismal font. It, too, is white marble, from Carrara, in Italy. Archbishop Conti pulls aside a foam covering so we can see the sculpted frieze around its rim: it shows people walking towards a baptism. Archbishop Conti says that, apart from the Howson painting, it’s the feature he’s most proud of. He explains that its place at the centre of the cathedral is a “clear statement about the importance of baptism”. The old font, he says, was behind a pillar, and difficult to use. When the cathedral re-opens it will be bubbling with water.

On our way out we pass a floor mosaic depicting the archdiocesan coat of arms. It was created by craftsmen in Bethlehem, Glasgow’s twin city. It took two years to make and was then shipped over. Circling it are the words: Specialis Filia Romanae Ecclesiae (“Special Daughter of the Roman Church”), the title given to Glasgow by Pope Alexander III in the 12th century.

As we step outside Archbishop Conti says the city council has spent more than £1 million paving the area in front of the cathedral. “I don’t want to say that too loudly,” he says, his eyes twinkling, “because of jealousy.”

The cloistered garden – the final element of Archbishop Conti’s vision – won’t be ready until May. It will have a fountain and a 200-year-old olive tree donated by a village in Tuscany. Archbishop Conti describes it as “an oasis from the world”, inbetween “the marketplace and the sanctuary”.

At its centre will be the world’s largest memorial to those who died in the sinking of the Arandora Star, a cruise ship, in 1940. The ship was torpedoed by the Nazis while carrying mainly British-Italian internees; about 800 people died. The memorial will be a cluster of mirrored steel slabs, like huge gravestones. On one side of each will be a quote from the gospels; on the other a line from classical Italian poetry.

Finally, we sit down in the lobby of the archdiocesan offices and I ask Archbishop Conti how he feels now the cathedral is about to re-open. “It’s been a long haul,” he says. He had wanted, he explains, to build a retrochoir as well. But he would have needed more time and more money.

The cost, he says, was £4.5 million, funded mainly by a couple of well-timed bequests and the selling off of “unused property”. Only 15 per cent – £670,000 – was from an archdiocesan fund-raising campaign called Faith in Action. The garden was funded by donations from Italian benefactors.

Once he is retired, he says, he will want to “just sit there and absorb the beauty of the building”. He will be happy “to see someone else in the bishop’s chair”, as it will relieve him of a “huge amount” of administrative work. He adds: “Hopefully I will be fit enough to continue the pastoral side of things.”

Asked if he has any advice for his successor he pauses and then, slowly, says with comic emphasis: “Just leave it alone now.” He explains that he has put a time capsule inside the altar containing his homily for Sunday’s consecration. “You can’t expect things to last for ever. Another generation will come and want to change the altar. That’s inevitable, I think. On the other hand, I hope there is much that will last the test of time.”

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ken-Purdie/1162381995 Ken Purdie

    I am looking forward to seeing it. I just hope he replaced the awful liitle altar!

  • Petrus

    I find the new Cathdral bizarre. There is no image of the Sacred Heart. The tabernacle is still shoved into the corner out of sight. There are less pews and hundreds of stackable chairs which will no doubt be used on big occasions. However, when using these chairs there is no kneelers. St. John Ogilvie looks absolutely demented in the painting by Peter Howson. The baptimsal font looks like a jacuzzi stuck bang smack in the centre of the main aisle. Bizarre. If the Cathedral was indeed desgined by Archbishop Conti, he shouldn’t give up his day job….or maybe he should!

  • http://exlaodicea.wordpress.com/ berenike

    Whose relics are in the new altar?

  • crouchback

    Come on Petrus it has some good bits. It is a lot lighter, it was dreich before. The stack chairs will only be used when they will have more than 200 people, which wont be that often. With these chairs out of the way you get an idea of space in what is a small building. The St John Ogilvie painting is like a Lucien Freud type painting, not to every ones taste, but I think it gives a sense of the man about to be hung drawn and quartered…who wouldn’t be demented..??. Rather than a more sanitized view of more “Traditional” paintings. The altar under the painting would be a great space to have the Traditional Mass….with or without seats. I used to go to Traditional Masses regularly at the Cathedral back in the 80′s early 90′s when Mgsr Boyle was there. Back then, the mass was said at the Lady Altar the lay out then made it pretty remote as there was quite a space between the altar and the front seats, if you were sitting further back then you really were quite away from the “action” if you’ll forgive the term. Why don’t we get a petition going asking the Archbishop to let us have regular Traditional Latin Masses at this altar…..I’d like to see his reasons for turning us down…????

  • Patrick

    Places of worship should be maintained without obscene expense. I recently attended mass at a newly renovated church, the budget for which was obscene. LCD TV’s on pillars, perfectly good wooden doors replaced with glass, the whole alter replaced. It turned my stomach. There are families in this country and around the world living hand to mouth and we (catholics) are funding these ‘renovation’ projects. We only require a building to come together and worship. We are the church, not a consecrated building. I no longer want to contribute to a church collection that is used like a government styled bottomless pit when there are people are starving in the world.

  • http://www.catholictruthscotland.com EditorCT

    The stackable chairs are there for the purpose of extra seating at the concerts which are already being held there in the new concert hall, I mean cathedral.

  • http://www.catholictruthscotland.com EditorCT

    I really do sometimes wonder. You have no problem with the Sacred Heart being stuck way up near the ceiling in the shop at the back and Our Lady’s altar being removed so there are no flowers, no place to kneel to pray to her.  As long as it is “lighter” – more to your taste. 

    And where on earth do you live in Scotland that you don’t know what has been regularly reported in Catholic Truth – that the reason given by the Archbishop for his dislike of the old rite Mass is that he prefers “the community centred Mass to the God centred Mass.”

    But why do I get the feeling you’ll “understand” him and make excuses for his refusal to obey the Pope on Summorum Pontificum?  Oh yes, I  know, because that’s what the fence sitters do best.  Make excuses for disobedient prelates.  Crackers.

  • http://www.catholictruthscotland.com EditorCT

    I’d be gobsmacked if ANY relics found their way into the new altar.  In Glasgow that would probably be regarded as superstitious nonsense.  But then, I could be wrong. Bound to  happen  one day.