Thu 17th Apr 2014 | Last updated: Thu 17th Apr 2014 at 20:13pm

Facebook Logo Twitter Logo RSS Logo
Hot Topics

Features

‘Jesus had a brief nervous breakdown’

Jill Hamilton meets Fr Jerome Murphy-O’Connor, the scholar with a bold view of what happened in the Garden of Gethsemane

By on Thursday, 21 June 2012

Fr Murphy-O’Connor

Fr Murphy-O’Connor

“Jesus had a brief nervous breakdown in the Garden of Gethsemane,” suggested Fr Jerome Murphy-O’Connor, the 77-year-old renowned expert on the New Testament. Tall, very erect, heavily built with a clipped white beard, “Fr Jerry,” as he is affectionately known, looks imposing even when sitting. Although he spoke with an air of authority, the idea of Jesus having a mental collapse after the emotional Last Supper came as a shock to me, as it would to most traditional Christians. But Fr Murphy-O’Connor, like his first cousin, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, can present an argument persuasively.

“Scholars,” he said, “have come a long way from seeing Jesus as a lonely figure in a moonlight-dappled garden whose body and spirit momentarily rebelled.”

He emphasised the wide gap between recent research and how average churchgoers still perceive many events in the life of Jesus.

Expanding on the contradictions surrounding the diverse re-tellings of Jesus’s final hours, his suffering and extreme anguish of the Agony in the Garden, he added: “When realising the imminence of his own demise, Jesus was deeply distraught and troubled, out of control.”

We chatted over pre-lunch drinks in the austere, book-lined bedroom-cum-study in the quiet confines of the École biblique et Archéologique Française de Jérusalem, one of the numerous stone monasteries in Jerusalem. For nearly half a century Fr Murphy-O’Connor has lived here on the outskirts of the Old City in this colonnaded, palace-like building which claims to be the oldest research institute in the Holy Land.

During his long years here Fr Murphy-O’Connor has built up a formidable reputation. No other priest in Jerusalem is as well known internationally. An esteemed professor of New Testament studies, he has the prestige of being one of the most respected biblical scholars in the world today. Indeed, he is a living legend, almost a landmark in Jerusalem.

The son of a prosperous wine merchant in Cork, he was educated by Christian Brothers and, not wanting to be a secular priest, joined the Dominicans. After graduating from a seminary in Ireland he chose scriptural studies, gaining a doctorate in Switzerland, followed by post-doctoral work at the University of Heidelberg. When he arrived in Jerusalem at the age of 28 he continued the challenging work of interpreting the Dead Sea Scrolls which he had begun in Germany.

Intensely interested in the history and archaeology of the Holy Land, and being very sociable by nature, he gathered together various diplomats, United Nations staff, journalists and priests who met on weekends to hike around various archaeological and historical sites. As a result of the weekend adventures and explorations of these enthusiasts, nicknamed the Sunday Group, Oxford University Press asked Fr Murphy-O’Connor to write an archaeological guidebook, The Holy Land. Since 1980 it has gone into five editions and sold over 100,000 copies. All the royalties, as with his books on St Paul and other publications, go to his Dominican institute.

Jerusalem has remained the focus of Fr Murphy-O’Connor’s life, but he has returned “home” to Cork most summers and keeps closely in touch with his Irish relatives. “We are a big clerical family. Three cousins, including Cormac, and three uncles were priests,” he said with pride.

Last year, as now, he was confined to a wheelchair, yet he managed the five hour flight to Cork. This summer, though, he won’t make the journey. “The trouble is that my good friend, Sister Kay, a nun, who looks after me when I am there, is now very ill,” he said sorrowfully.

Fr Murphy-O’Connor radiated a sense of confident well-being, and it was hard to believe that he is unable to walk far or breathe properly without medical assistance. Having recovered well from a coma seven years ago, he has suffered another health setback. For months he has had endure having a plastic tube from an oxygen machine attached to his nose 24 hours per day. This, though, has not stopped him working long hours each day at his computer, writing and editing. As he is not the sort of person who complains about personal discomfort, his only words relating to his physical disabilities are praise for the medical staff and the devoted students who push his wheelchair to the dining room and to prayer.

Nothing hinders Fr Murphy O’Connor’s sharp intellect. He manages to keep up to date on the latest historical research and critical biblical scholarship which shapes interpretations of events in the Bible. Chapter five, “What really happened at Gethsemane?” in his new book, The Keys to Jerusalem, refers to the debates surrounding the emotional turmoil of Jesus on the night prior to his arrest. The book contains 12 articles on the history, archaeology and theology of Jerusalem. All deal with problems which he thinks have not yet been given satisfactory solutions.

The really fascinating pages are those which analyse the controversy over one of the most soul-wrenching episodes in the gospels, that is, Jesus’s prayer to God in Gethsemane. Fr Murphy-O’Connor even goes so far as to ask the question: “How do we know the words of Jesus’s prayer? If the disciples were asleep and they had no time with Jesus after he was arrested and before he was put to death, how does anyone know what Jesus prayed? Where is the source for the content?”

His answer came as a shock: “They made it up!”

This was the sort of remark one might hear from an atheist or a non-believer, not an august Catholic biblical scholar.

He continued: “The only possibility is that certain disciples projected on to Jesus the emotions that they imagined they would experience if they themselves suddenly realised their death by torture was imminent.”

The notion that the authors of the gospels used imagination, and that their words sometimes only reflect a kernel of the historical truth, was difficult to grasp. As he sat at his neat desk, Fr Murphy-O’Connor spoke of the intensely human Jesus revealed by Mark: “Mark stressed that it is a fully human thing to have a nervous breakdown if you are about to be tortured to death.”

To strengthen his reasoning, Fr Murphy-O’Connor added that modern scholars agree that Mark was the first to write any of the gospels and was, therefore, more likely to have had reliable first-hand sources. The distortion of facts developed, Fr Murphy-O’Connor believes, because “it is clear in the story that the early Church did not want a Jesus that was really human”.

“In contrast, John’s Jesus is always in control. Unlike John, Mark accepted the full humanity of Jesus. Remember, that it is only in the first source used by Mark that Jesus has a brief nervous breakdown.”

He paused: “However, in Mark’s second source there is no reference to this. It suppresses Jesus’s breakdown by making him say: ‘My soul is sorrowful unto death.’ Such a quote makes it look as if Jesus was talking about his internal feelings, yet it is a quotation from Psalm 42.”

He added: “This was all written at the very beginning of thought of who Jesus was and what he felt. Mark’s writings were about 40 years after Jesus died, around the year 70 AD” – the time of the first Jewish-Roman War, when Christians, like Jews, in Jerusalem were persecuted.

“Young men and women in their 20s who had been in the company of Jesus would have been alive in the year 70. So even though Mark was writing 40 years after the death of Jesus, he would have had access to witnesses. We know that Mark combined two sources which, of course, must be earlier than the year 70.”

Halting to ensure that I fully understood what he was saying, Fr Murphy-O’Connor then spoke of how Mark’s second source is similar to the way that John portrayed Jesus at Gethsemane: always completely in control. “Presenting Jesus as a man who loved people and having compassion was no problem. But they didn’t like him having a nervous breakdown, being out of control. It proved to be more than other Christians could accept. Ignorance, they also tried to suppress.”

But can Christians even now accept the human frailty of Jesus, not just his divine nature?

Fr Jerome Murphy-O’Connor’s new book, The Keys to Jerusalem, is published by Oxford University Press, priced £65

  • Mike Yates, Sydney, Australia

     Fr Thomas, I think it is clear from the way you refer to Jesus only with “He” and never “he” that you wish to emphasise his divinity; and yet the Church believes and teaches both His divinity and his humanity (not confused). Jesus was certainly setting in motion a reconciling with God for the whole of humanity but if he was truly human (and we are not Christians if we don’t genuinely believe this) then, as PeterOz said, Jesus would have been close to panic although as a Christian I know and believe he continued to trust in his Father. And you can certainly feel like despairing, like giving up and tell God that and still decide not to give up, not to let go of your faith and trust in your loving Father.

    You also say Jesus did not have Faith at all; I wonder if the Church teaches that? In my understanding of Catholic faith he did have faith and he continued to believe in God’s love (that of his Father) despite everything that was happening to him. I find your language of the very controlled divine Jesus (who is not able to feel any of our worst feelings, not really) exactly what Fr Gerome is challenging. Your response to a man whom we worship as ouir God screaming in appalling pain to his God with your analysis of “did” versus “have” says to me you may not really believe in Jesus’ humanity in the way we need to. In short, you seem to have opted for Jesus as divine (our Divine Saviour) but the richness of the truth is to not overemphasise his divinity and not to overemphasise his humanity, isn’t it?

    MichaelOz

  • Burt

    Well Father, let me say a big thank you to you. Sometimes a guy can get disheartened by the many clerics who seem to have lost their way, especially the most high ranking. It’s good to know that there are signs that dedicated priests are waking up to what’s gone wrong over the years. Priests like you, and good news, my parish has got a new priest who is as sound as a pound. :)

  • Thomassouthworth

    I dont see the conservative commentators here denying the full humanity of Jesus at all.  However, I would say that since Christ is  truly God and truly man, and that, as true man He is perfect, then it would not be possible for him to have a nervous breakdown, as a breakdown implies a failing, a lack.  Surely Christ had nothing lacking even in his humanity.  I actually cannot see any reference in Mark that Our Lord had a nervous breakdown at all, but that in His humanity He prayed to His Father.

    In regards to the historical critical method being employed for the scriptural interpretation, it (as usual) seems to exlude any divine inspiration whatsoever!  If the Holy Ghost is the author of the Scriptures (as Divinu affantu and Providentisimus Deus confirm, as far as I can remember), then the  apostles didnt ‘make it up’! Nothing in the scriptures is made up.  And like someone commented, the notion that the apostles were ‘projecting onto Jesus the the emotions that they imagined they would experience’ is more akin to faulty Rogerian pop psychology claptrap then any sort of scholarly analysis.  Of course as somebody else deftly mentioned, Our Lord could have quite easily told them after rthe resurrection.  Hows that for a source, Our Lord Himsel.  Mathew and John were Apostles, so were as close to the events and the people involved, including Our Lord, as could be.

  • http://profiles.google.com/ray.marshall Ray Marshall

    There hasn’t been an Irish saint since Oliver Plunkett maybe 4-500 years ago.  This poor excuse is a good reason for that.
     

  • Todd Drain

    Another possibility is one ignored by Biblical athei… Scholars. Q, the unbeknownst source of Gospel accounts, is probably Mary.  In His conversations with her after His Resurrection and before His Ascension, along with countless conversations that no doubt occurred earlier in life, Jesus likely conveyed a good number of things to her that would eventually be conveyed to the Apostles and their disciples. 2000 years removed, we really need to come to grips with the fact that most ancient history, even that as important as the life and times of our Lord and the people around Him, historians really don’t know from a hole in the ground, that that they often cannot find their behinds with both hands.  And £65? Cripes? Are books made of gold leaf now in the UK?

  • Todd Drain

    The particular judgment of a priest or religious involves the founders and principles of their Order.  Father “Jerry” is going to receive quite the rude awakening upon death. Modernist in the classic Harnackian style is he…

  • C A Geldart

    appalling nonsense which completely misunderstands both scripture and the Eucharist.