Mon 1st Sep 2014 | Last updated: Mon 1st Sep 2014 at 11:50am

Facebook Logo Twitter Logo RSS Logo
Hot Topics

Features

‘The Church is not a group of friends’

Ed West talks to pioneering Brazilian traditionalist Bishop Fernando Arêas Rifan about Rome, heresy and healing divisions

By on Tuesday, 11 September 2012

Visita ad limina 16

The growing popularity of Mass in the Extraordinary Form may be one of the more surprising cultural developments of recent years, though it has gone little noticed outside the Catholic world. But it is a trend that may reverberate down the years, or at least represent a deeper, underlying cultural change. If that does happen, historians of western culture will surely note the Brazillian experiment that started at the beginning of the 21st century.

The Personal Apostolic Administration of St John Mary Vianney is a “particular church” for those with an attachment to the Extraordinary Form. It shares the same area as the Brazilian Diocese of Campos in an experiment begun by Blessed John Paul II to see whether those attached respectively to the new and old forms of the Mass could live side by side.
Five years after the experiment began Cardinal Darío Castrillón Hoyos, then prefect of the Vatican Congregation for the Clergy, said that the late pope’s project had been “partly proved” and that “peaceful coexistence” could be “a beautiful reality”.

There can be little doubt that this prepared the ground for Summorum Pontificum, Pope Benedict’s 2007 apostolic letter which liberated the older form of the Mass. As Bishop Fernando Arêas Rifan, apostolic administrator of the Personal Apostolic Administration of St John Mary Vianney, said at the time: “Our very existence and our good relations spoke in favour of it.”

Since then, the Extraordinary Form Mass has begun to thrive around the world, much to the bishop’s delight. “It’s growing everywhere,” he tells me when we meet during his recent trip to Britain at the invitation of the Latin Mass Society. “This is a richness, a treasure of the Church. The Catholic Church has many different rites – more than 20 – even though we have unity of government.”

The Extraordinary Form was never abrogated, he points out. “It’s not a contradiction. The Pope said that in his opinion we can liberate [the Extraordinary Form] and with Summorum Pontificum he freed us to celebrate everywhere. He intends to have liturgical peace in the Church, not everyone fighting against each other. One can give benefit to the other. The new form today perhaps privileges the participation of the people. The old sense privileged the mystery, respect. Both forms, I think, are very good.”

Bishop Rifan is said to be close to Pope Benedict, who he admires, loves and respects in a way that is very disarming. During our interview he powers up his iPad to reveal a screensaver of the then Fr Joseph Ratzinger and shows me an album of papal photos. And yet there was a time when Bishop Rifan was on the outside, and things could have turned out differently.

Born in October 1950 and raised in Campos, Fernando Arêas Rifan was an only child with suitably cosmopolitan Brazilian parents. His mother was a mix of Spanish and Swiss, his father a Lebanese Catholic. Ordained a priest in 1974 Fr Rifan had joined the Priestly Union of Saint Jean-Marie Vianney, a group founded by Bishop Antônio de Castro Mayer of Campos, who until his retirement in 1981 had refused to accept the New Rite. In 1988 Fr Rifan was assistant presbyter at the famous Écône consecrations during which Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre consecrated four SSPX bishops in defiance of Pope John Paul II. After Bishop Mayer died in 1991 the Priestly Union chose Fr Licinio Rangel, who was consecrated bishop without papal mandate by three of the SSPX bishops, to serve as administrator.

In 2000 Cardinal Castrillón Hoyos established contact and the following year the Priestly Union requested reconciliation. The Personal Apostolic Administration of St John Mary Vianney was established in 2002, with Bishop Rangel as Apostolic Administrator. Fr Rifan was then named as Bishop Rangel’s coadjutor. After the bishop’s death at the end of the year Bishop Rifan became the leader of the Personal Apostolic Administration of St John Mary Vianney.

Today the Personal Apostolic Administration has 10 churches, plus a cathedral, seminarians and parishes. Thanks partly to help from the British Friends of Campos, the apostolic adminstration supports schools, orphanages and a house for elderly people. Members built a cathedral in 15 years and the bishop shows me pictures of a Mass and various public processions. The scenes are lively, colourful and full of young people.

The bishop argues that the apostolic administration has been good for the Church and says there has been a fair amount of learning on both sides. He says he has a good relationship with the Bishop of Campos and there is a lot of mutual consultation and regular visits.

I ask the bishop if he understands why some Catholics find the Extraordinary Form rather off-putting.
“I think they are afraid of losing Vatican II, the new form, but the Pope has dealt with these issues,” he says. In Brazil, “like here, there are bishops against, and bishops for”, but ”year by year the bishops are coming around to the Extraordinary Form”.

And what about the personal animosity Bishop Rifan receives from traditionalists who are not in full communion with Rome? He shrugs. “I have proceeded with my conscience and supported by the Pope. I conserve the traditional Mass, but in communion. To be in communion with the Church does not mean I agree with
any confusions or abuses or heresies.”

He attributes divisions among Catholics to the fact that “the Catholic Church has two parts: the divine part and human part”.

“The divine is the constitution, grace, doctrine, infallibility, the assistance of Our Lord,” he says. “The human part is the bit where we are: jealousy, confusions, problems and the history of the Church. If we regard only the human part we risk losing the faith. The leaders of the heresies said they wanted to reform the Church because they see only the human part.

“We can be inside the Church to combat these problems. The Church is not a group of friends, it is a family. In a family we
have good people and bad people. The Lord said the Kingdom of Heaven is the net and there are all kinds of fish. The separation is at the end of times.”

If you would like to support the apostolic administration you can send a cheque payable to “British Friends of Campos” to 3 Marder Road, London W13 9EN. Email camposfriends@btinternet.com for further information

  • Dr_John_Smythe

    It’s refreshing to read an article that acknowledges the growth of the Tridentine Rite.

    However, it is sadly typical the article refuses to acknowledge the only reason we were given the Summorum Pontificum is because Bishop Fellay and the SSPX demanded it of the Vatican before any theological discussions on the rampant heresy of modernism in the one true Church today.

    To say nothing of only using the term “extraordinary” as opposed to the proper title …

    Sometimes things are offended more by what they exclude.

  • roger1212

    “One [form] can give benefit to the other.”
    ” Both forms, I think, are very good.”

    Hmm… try running that past any saint of the past 1500 years and they’d be unlikely to agree.  The Novus Ordo is quite obviously protestant-leaning. 

    I’ve grown up with Mass in English and all I can see is boredom, apathy, loss of faith, and empty pews. Contrast this with vitality seen in latin mass communities. 

    Lex orandi, lex credendi.  By that rule, most N.O Catholics have become protestant in thinking.

  • Linen on the Hedgerow

    An English or Welsh Diocese of “co-existence” would be good…….but unlikely.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_HS27N3BRDI4BAMY4I754QZUWIQ rodlarocque1931

    I have supported the SSPX since about 1989 and recall when Bishop de Castro Meyer passed away. It was a sad day when his spiritual children reconcilled with the Vatican and now claim that the Novus Ordo is OK. The good Bishop is proably rolling over in his grave in sadness.
    I agree that being in communion is important, but one shouldn’t have to say things that are not true to be accepted.
    The Novus Ordo is evil, plain and simple because it lacks the good that it is supposed to have. It is a mockery of the Mass and leads people to abandon the faith.
    Facts bear this out, but who listens to facts nowadays?

  • Mark

    As an English speaker living in Brazil I would like to see this organization in São Paulo where every parish I’ve been to has liberation theology type sermons, bad music, and a banal celebration of the mass. The Novus Ordo is simply what Anglicans did to the mass 500 years ago but without  the good choral music and incense.

  • Sean

    I’ve attended Latin Masses and although I have nothing against it, I have not seen the vibrant communities and the packed churches. I’ve seen a lot of old people, lot of ritual and something I find fascinating. If people think this will solve the empty churches and get a new generation flocking to catholicism I’m afraid I can’t see it myself. I would like to be proved wrong but at the moment although I see roots of a revival here I think I need to sit back and see if the Latin Mass can become main stream in parishes. However, it’s going to need a lot of people to give up there time to instruct people in the Latin Mass. One can’t expect people to just start turning up without instruction. I have an interest in Latin Mass but as yet no one has ever said I’ll teach you or we run a class locally. If I wanted to become a Jehovah Witness I would have someone around my house in a week teaching me. Us Catholics are peculiar people!

  • Parasum

     ‘The Church is not a group of friends’

    ## “You are My friends, if you do what I command you”. OTOH, he may have have been thinking of the exceedingly unfriendly way in which Catholics have behaved, to one another and to non-Catholics.

    Granted, the context is this:

    ““We can be inside the Church to combat these problems. The Church is not a group of friends, it is a family. In a family we have good people and bad people. The Lord said the Kingdom of Heaven is
    the net and there are all kinds of fish. The separation is at the end
    of times.””

    ## Even so, it’s over-simplifying to call people good or bad – the division is not between people, but within them. If people are labelled “bad”, then they can be dismissed or demonised; if that had happened during the first generation, there would have been no Saint Paul. To the great loss of Christians. 

  • Amicus

    Douay-Rheims Bible
    I will not now call you servants: for the servant knoweth not what his lord doth. But I have called you friends: because all things whatsoever I have heard of my Father, I have made known to you. (John 15:15)Apparently, your Excellency, the Church is a group of friends.

  • Fr. Thomas Poovathinkal

    “The old sense privileged the mystery, respect.”

    IF MYSTERY MAKING ARE TO BE PROMOTED, WHY DID JESUS UNDID THE MYSTERY AND REVEAL HIMSELF TO US IN WORDS, DEEDS AND IN HIS OWN VERY PERSON?

  • Fr. Thomas Poovathinkal

    WHEN PEOPLE GROW SENILE WE MUST MAKE THEM MANY CONCESSIONS. IT IS CHARITY.
    BUT THEN TO ALLOW THEM TO CARRY AWAY CHILDREN AND THE YOUNG IS TOO MUCH. 

  • Josepha Blay

    Please can you show the homily Pope BenedictXVI gave to families on 6th September 2012