The island of Guam, an American territory in the Pacific, is in the news again. Well known for its part in World War II – when it was occupied by the Japanese, and later liberated at considerable cost by the Americans in July and August 1944 – the island is now in the crosshairs of the North Koreans.
At present the threat to Guam by the ever-belligerent North Korean regime has only been expressed in words. Nevertheless it should be taken seriously, given North Korea’s military capability and its ability to spark a nuclear war. Moreover, North Korea is, unlike any other state, seemingly immune to diplomatic overtures.
The people of Guam are familiar with war, for the Battle of Guam saw the deaths of more than 18,000 Japanese soldiers, who fought to the bitter end rather than surrender. Guam’s residents are also overwhelmingly Catholic, for the island was, until 1898, a Spanish colony, an important stopping off point for the galleons plying their way between Mexico and the Philippines. The first cathedral was founded a year after the Spanish arrived, in 1669, and is dedicated to El Dulce Nombre de María (The Sweet Name of Mary).
So far there have been no reports of panic on the island, despite the threats from Pyongyang. Rather, the reaction has been to pray for peace in the world. Archbishop Michael Byrnes has spoken of praying for a “just resolution of differences, and prudence in both speech and action”. How wise those words are! In an age when so many speak before they think, and where so many assume that religion stokes wars and hatred, it is good to hear the perennial message of the Church, dwelling as it does on rationality and moderation in all things. In addition Guamanians have been turning in prayer to their patroness, and saying the rosary for peace.
Those in Guam are giving the world a lesson. Calm under threat, and having known the horrors of war, devoted to peace, they show us the Catholic response to international tensions and war-mongering.
No one, in Pyongyang or elsewhere, should use the threat of war as an instrument of policy, and we should all be quick to rebuke those who do. As Blessed Paul VI said, when addressing the United Nations in October 1965: “It is enough to recall that the blood of millions, countless unheard-of sufferings, useless massacres and frightening ruins have sanctioned the agreement that unites you with an oath that ought to change the future history of the world: never again war, never again war!”
The words of Paul VI remind us that the innocent are usually the first to suffer in war. Let the blameless people of Guam reinforce that message, and recall all parties to the necessity of reducing tensions with North Korea and neutralising its threats. May their example of calm under threat motivate other regional powers, in particular China, to act in the interests of peace.
A recent study has found that many people think that holding religious belief is a necessary safeguard against grossly immoral conduct, and that atheists are commonly viewed as “potentially morally depraved and dangerous”, even by other atheists.
While this tendency was known from earlier work, the study confirmed the view by looking at the attitudes of more than 3,000 people in 13 countries. It seems that human beings in general tend to mistrust people who are not subject to the moral laws imposed by religious belief.
There are limits to the usefulness of this kind of study. We can think of our friends who are entirely trustworthy despite their lack of belief. And who, lending £5 to Richard Dawkins, would expect him to trouser it because he accepts no divine law? Nevertheless, there is some connection between the moral law and belief in God.
St Paul teaches that the moral law is written on our hearts, so that everyone knows, deep down, when they are offending against it. But it is much easier to discover that moral law when we are in touch with a divine revelation – Scripture and tradition – which supports it. And though atheism does not in itself make it impossible to be moral, it places a greater burden on the individual to work everything out for themselves. As Nietzsche said, “When one gives up the Christian faith, one pulls the right to Christian morality out from under one’s feet. This morality is by no means self-evident.”
Some modern atheists give us an even bleaker picture than Nietzsche: they say that there is no meaning or purpose in anything; that humans are just collections of cells, and principles are all illusions. To believe in objective morality, say philosophers like Alex Rosenberg, is no sounder than believing in God.
Faced with these depressing beliefs, we should not write off all atheists as potential thieves and murderers. But we should thank God for giving us the Church, and making the moral law so much easier to discover.
This page is available to subscribers. Click here to sign in or get access.
Areas of Catholic Herald business are still recovering post-pandemic.
However, we are reaching out to the Catholic community and readership, that has been so loyal to the Catholic Herald. Please join us on our 135 year mission by supporting us.
We are raising £250,000 to safeguard the Herald as a world-leading voice in Catholic journalism and teaching.
We have been a bold and influential voice in the church since 1888, standing up for traditional Catholic culture and values. Please consider donating.