Exactly 50 years ago, in December 1967, I washed up in London, battered and bruised, after having been arrested, violently interrogated and briefly imprisoned by the bad old apartheid security police in Pretoria.
As advised separately by the head of chancery at the British embassy and my own lawyer, I took the first flight out of South Africa the following morning.
I have always felt a profound debt of gratitude to Britain. It did not roll out the red carpet but, rather impassively, it offered me a refuge and the opportunity to lead a normal life of anonymity, which is the blessing of a big city. No more. Like many other Jews, I no longer feel at ease in Britain.
Even British Jews, who have not experienced the sort of anti-Semitism that has visited their French cousins, have a highly developed sense of danger. The danger they now sense is Jeremy Corbyn, the unreconstructed counter-culture revolutionary who remains stuck in the Marxist mindset of the mid-Sixties. Since he became leader of Britain’s Labour Party, there has been an outpouring of unlimited hatred of Israel and a remarkable upsurge in antisemitism, a rare meeting point of the far Left and the far Right.
Corbyn’s growing strength is in contrast to the declining political fortunes of the Prime Minister, Theresa May, a committed friend of Israel and the Jewish community in Britain. Corbyn, resistant to compromise and conciliation, is happy to host Hezbollah and Hamas officials in Britain while flatly declining to visit Israel, or even to attend a dinner in London last month to celebrate the centenary of the Balfour Declaration, alongside May and the Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
What makes the issue rather urgent for Jews now is that, while Corbyn was regarded as a joke when first elected leader (80 per cent of the Parliamentary Labour Party declared their lack of confidence in him), he has been kept afloat by growing far-Left grassroots party support. As power seeps away from the Conservative government, the prospect of a Corbyn victory is becoming ever more real.
“What will we do if Corbyn wins the next election?” my wife asked.
“We’ll emigrate,” I replied, shocked by my immediate reaction.
I was not alone. A few hours later, I met our GP and posed my wife’s question.
“Emigrate,” he said without hesitation, waxing lyrical about the prospect of setting up a general practice near Beersheba in southern Israel. I had the same response from half a dozen others to whom I asked the question.
In case you think that my friends and colleagues are all paranoid, I could point to other examples. According to a survey conducted by YouGov for the British-based Campaign Against Antisemitism, one in three British Jews, feeling exposed and unprotected, has considered emigrating as a result of anti-Semitism. Fewer than 60 per cent feel welcome in Britain and 17 per cent feel positively unwelcome. “This is unsurprising,” says the survey, “given the 45 per cent surge in anti-Semitic crime since 2014.” It found that four out of five British Jews suspect the Labour Party of harbouring anti-Semites. And it found that after Islam, the far Left was the major source of anti-Semitism.
Three prominent British Jews – Simon Schama, Simon Sebag-Montefiore and Howard Jacobson – wrote to the Times to express their concern at “the tone and direction of debate about Israel and Zionism within the Labour Party”.
“We are alarmed,” they wrote, “that during the past few years, constructive criticism of Israeli governments has morphed into something closer to anti-Semitism under the cloak of so-called anti-Zionism… Although anti-Zionists claim innocence of any anti-Semitic intent, anti-Zionism frequently borrows the libels of classical Jew-hating. Accusations of international Jewish conspiracy and control of the media have resurfaced to support false equations of Zionism with colonialism and imperialism, and the promotion of vicious, fictitious parallels with genocide and Nazism. How, in such instances, is anti-Zionism distinguishable from anti-Semitism?
“Such themes and language have become widespread in Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party,” they added. “So far the Labour leadership’s reaction has been derisory. It is not enough to denounce all racisms in general when this specific strain rages unchecked… We believe that anti-Zionism, with its anti-Semitic characteristics, has no place in a civil society.”
Also writing to the Times, Vernon Bogdanor, professor of government at King’s College London, noted that “Britain has always been the least anti-Semitic of countries… Now, for the first time in British history, a major party leader has been accused by his own MPs of failing to ensure that his party offers a safe space for an ethnic minority.”
In a recent report, Labour’s David Winnick and Chuka Umunna declared that Corbyn’s “reluctance to separate anti-Semitism from other forms of racism has created what some have referred to as a ‘safe space’ for those with vile attitudes towards Jewish people. The failure of the Labour Party to deal consistently and effectively with anti-Semitic incidents in recent years risks lending force to allegations that elements of the Labour movement are institutionally anti-Semitic.”
I remain grateful to Britain for giving me a home over much of the past 50 years. But to my own rather anguished surprise, I find myself contemplating the thought that Britain may be changing and that this may not be my home for much longer. I now feel I may have outstayed my welcome.
Douglas Davis is a former senior editor of the Jerusalem Post
Areas of Catholic Herald business are still recovering post-pandemic.
However, we are reaching out to the Catholic community and readership, that has been so loyal to the Catholic Herald. Please join us on our 135 year mission by supporting us.
We are raising £250,000 to safeguard the Herald as a world-leading voice in Catholic journalism and teaching.
We have been a bold and influential voice in the church since 1888, standing up for traditional Catholic culture and values. Please consider donating.