At the end of this month the world will be marking the 20th anniversary of the tragic death of Diana, Princess of Wales, which occurred in the early morning of Sunday, 31st August 1997. A 20th anniversary is a significant one, and given that August is traditionally a slow news month, we can expect to see extensive coverage of the anniversary. Indeed this has already begun, with two major documentaries, one on Channel 4, and one on ITV, the latter made with the co-operation of her sons, the former promising, but hardly delivering, new material.
There has also ben a series of news stories, which will no doubt continue, some of them featuring recriminations about old wounds, and revelations about matters which should surely be forgotten.
The late Princess lived in the glare of publicity, and was being pursued by photographers when she died. Many may undoubtedly feel that she is best left to rest in peace, and Catholics in particular, used as we are to praying for the dead on their anniversaries, may wish to pray for the repose of her soul, and ignore much of the raking over of the details of her life.
Sadly, the media have not learned to leave the late Princess alone, and we ought to reflect on why this is so, and why, over the coming month, we shall be hearing so much more about her.
The continuing fascination with Diana reflects the desire to fill an emptiness at the heart of public discourse. We lack heroes. Of the few we have, many reflect our own inability to make sense of our lives. Diana died before she had fully found the role which seemed to be hers, as “queen in people’s hearts”. Acclaimed by the then idolised Tony Blair as “the people’s Princess”, she reminds us that we are all lost in the world, people who live incomplete lives.
Diana was also loved for her beauty, hence the many photographic tributes to her. Catholic iconography should remind us of that beauty is only skin deep, and that real beauty is found within a person. It is part of the mission of the Church to proclaim that beauty is a moral quality, not a physical one.
Diana’s vulnerability, and her evident unhappiness in marriage, must also make us question our own values. If someone is unhappy, we should respect their privacy, and not want to read about them in the press. If someone is unhappy we should above all want to help them, in order to assuage their grief. We should absolutely not revel in their pain, masking this as an act of sympathy. Too much of the coverage of Diana was and is thinly disguised voyeurism. This must be deeply upsetting to her family, who have a right to privacy, whatever their public role.
May she rest in peace, and may all of us here below find some sense and meaning in this earthly pilgrimage.
Go figure
The Advertising Standards Authority has made a significant ruling: It has upheld the claim that Northern Ireland’s strict abortion laws have been responsible for saving the lives of 100,000 people. It is, they say, a reasonable calculation which is not misleading.
This is welcome news for pro-lifers. It also carries a punch because it invites us to think beyond the baby in the womb and reminds us that we are talking of full-grown adults who in fact have been killed when, unknown and unwanted, they had no capacity to defend themselves. Should anyone think this is a provincial matter we may remember that, since the Abortion Act, the figure for Great Britain is some eight million.
How many of your friends will you inform about this? Perhaps only those you know well because you suspect that many of them will disagree with you. These will not be gangsters or child beaters but decent caring and thoughtful people. They may defend their position with hard cases – such as rape, foetal abnormality or danger to the mother.
But further discussion may show that these reasons are merely a respectable cloak for the belief that abortion should be a matter for the mother’s choice. And, according to some polls, this is currently the view of the majority of our fellow British Catholics.
It is as if we as a society have unconsciously come to the belief that the child in the womb belongs to an alien species. Indeed, even the phrase “child in the womb” may be attacked for its emotional element: we should speak instead of the foetus or the embryo. Precision is desirable so we might better refer to the entity in the womb simply as an individual human being. This is difficult to challenge, just as it is difficult to claim that there is a class of innocent individual human beings whom we are permitted to destroy.
Areas of Catholic Herald business are still recovering post-pandemic.
However, we are reaching out to the Catholic community and readership, that has been so loyal to the Catholic Herald. Please join us on our 135 year mission by supporting us.
We are raising £250,000 to safeguard the Herald as a world-leading voice in Catholic journalism and teaching.
We have been a bold and influential voice in the church since 1888, standing up for traditional Catholic culture and values. Please consider donating.