Fri 22nd Aug 2014 | Last updated: Thu 21st Aug 2014 at 16:56pm

Facebook Logo Twitter Logo RSS Logo
Hot Topics

Latest News

Pius XII ‘secured visas for Jews’ after Kristallnacht

By on Wednesday, 7 July 2010

The wartime pope may have saved thousands of Jewish lives by secretly securing visas so they could escape the Third Reich, a German historian has claimed.

Pope Pius XII, who has been severely criticised for his alleged silence during the Holocaust, may have arranged the exodus of some 200,000 Jews from Germany just three weeks after Kristallnacht.

The claim was made by Dr Michael Hesemann, an academic carrying out research in the Vatican Archives for the Pave the Way Foundation, a US-based inter-faith group.

He said that Cardinal Eugenio Pacelli – the future Pius XII – wrote to Catholic archbishops around the world to urge them to apply for visas for “non-Aryan Catholics” and Jewish converts to Christianity who wanted to leave Germany.

Dr Hesemann says that additional evidence suggests that in fact the visas would be given to ordinary Jews desperate to escape persecution.

“The fact that this letter speaks of ‘converted Jews’ and ‘non-Aryan’ Catholics indeed seems to be a cover,” said Dr Hesemann.

“You couldn’t be sure that Nazi agents wouldn’t learn about this initiative,” he said. “Pacelli had to make sure they didn’t misuse it for their propaganda, that they could not claim that the Church is an ally of the Jews.”

A clue that Cardinal Pacelli was not referring to Jewish converts, said Dr Hesemann, came in a part of the letter in which he asks Church leaders to provide for the “spiritual welfare” of the refugees and to “protect their religious cult, customs and traditions” – which distinguished them from Catholics.

Also, in their reply to the cardinal’s appeal many bishops dropped the pretence and simply referred to the recipients of the visas as “persecuted Jews”.

The appeal from Cardinal Pacelli, then the Vatican’s Secretary of State, was dated November 30 1938 – just 20 days after the “night of broken glass” when Nazis rose up against German Jews, burning thousands of homes, synagogues and businesses.

Cardinal Pacelli was able to ask for the visas because the 1933 concordat he signed with the Nazis specifically provided protection for Jews who converted to Christianity.

Elliot Hershberg, the chairman of Pave the Way Foundation, said the intervention would have inevitably saved the lives of many ordinary Jewish people.

“We believe that many Jews who were successful in leaving Europe may not have had any idea that their visas and travel documents were obtained through these Vatican efforts,” he said.

“Everything we have found thus far seems to indicate the known negative perception of Pope Pius XII is wrong,” he added.

Professor Ronald Rychlak, author of Hitler, the War and the Pope, said the new evidence proved that “efforts that appear to have been directed to protect only converted Jews actually protected Jews regardless of whether they had converted”.

But Dr Edward Kessler, the director of the Cambridge-based Woolfson Institute of Abrahamic Faiths, said the documents would not “resolve all the basic issues still under discussion”.
“It is clear that Pius XII facilitated the saving of Roman Jews,” he said.

“Very few people deny this or if they do, their views are rejected by mainstream scholarly opinion. I agree – as do all reasonable scholars – that Pius XII was not a Nazi sympathiser, an anti-Semite and a Hitler collaborator. The fundamental question is: what did he do, did he do enough and did he do it soon enough?”

In December Pope Benedict XVI placed Pius one step closer to canonisation when he declared him “Venerable”, meaning that the Church believes he lived a life of heroic virtue. Two miracles are needed to canonise him as a saint and the Vatican is already investigating at least one apparently inexplicable healing at his intercession.

But some Jewish groups want the process frozen until the Vatican opens its secret wartime archives in 2014. At present the Vatican is cataloguing millions of documents into thousands of folders and files and has doubled its staff to speed up the process.

British historian Sir Martin Gilbert, the world’s leading expert on the Holocaust, has said that Pope Pius XII should be considered as a “righteous gentile” by Yad Vashem.

  • http://twitter.com/sixmillionbook Gabriel Wilensky

    For the layman, sometimes it’s hard to know what things actually mean. After all, one cannot be an expert on everything, so we must rely on others whom we trust. The problem of course is that even when we read information from trusted sources we may be misled. For instance, a recent article on Zenit discusses some documents recently found by Michael Hesemann from Pave the Way Foundation. I think there is a problem of interpretation in the way these documents are evaluated. In the past Mr. Hesemann also presented findings of documents in a misleading way, as he implied the Catholic Church had always been opposed to the Nazi Party. Even though it’s true the Church banned membership into the party prior to 1933, after Hitler came to power and the Vatican signed an agreement with Nazi Germany that same year the Church lifted the ban. This detail, and the fact that millions of Catholics subsequently became members of the Nazi Party and wholeheartedly supported it and its policies seems to have been conveniently overlooked in Mr. Hesemann’s reporting. See “Paving the way to disinformation” (http://www.sixmillioncrucifixions.com/blog/?p=212).

    The new documents recently found were letters sent by the Vatican Secretary of State and later Pope Pius XII Cardinal Pacelli in 1938 to several nunciatures and apostolic delegations. In these letters, Cardinal Pacelli requested visas for “ebrei convertiti” (converted Jews), and “non-Aryan Catholics”. This of course sounds good, but not as good as Mr. Hesemann would like us to think. The reason for this is that Mr. Hesemann tells us that “converted Jews” and “non-Aryan Catholics,” are most likely euphemisms that really mean “Jews”. To support this claim, he cites another part of the letter in which Cardinal Pacelli tells the bishops that “Care should be taken that sanctuaries are provided to safeguard their spiritual welfare and to protect their religious cult, customs and traditions.” Since in Mr. Hesemann’s view a converted Jew becomes a Catholic and therefore no longer has any “customs, or traditions of their own”, this must have meant the request for visas really referred to “Jews”. For a historian who should know about the history of Catholic persecution of Jews during the Middle Ages, particularly the expulsions from several European countries, especially Spain, this is an odd thing to say. As was the case in the 15th century, Jews converted to avoid the unpleasant options of mandatory expulsion or being burned at the stake. Many of these “conversos” (converted Jews) became baptized Catholics to the outside world, while secretly retaining their “religious cult, customs and traditions” of their own. Even though many Jews became true Catholics in the Middle Ages as well as during the Nazi Era, many if not most did it because they were forced to and remained crypto-Jews. In other words, many of those converted Jews, or “non-Aryan Catholics” as they were euphemistically referred as, remained Jewish.

    Reportedly one of the letters Pacelli sent reads, “Do not engage in saving only Jewish people but also synagogues, cultural centers and everything that pertains to their faith: the Torah scrolls, libraries, cultural centers, etc.” Supposedly this shows that the cardinal was not only trying to save Jews but also their cultural heritage as well. Maybe so, although one must ask the question of why the Vatican felt the need to use cryptic messages and euphemisms if in the end they were going to try to save even buildings. How could they hide that from the Nazis?

    For some reason, Pave the Way Foundation and its supporters claim that historians who oppose the Pope-Pius-as-saint point of view do not recognize the threat to the Vatican and the pope. Oh, really? I do not know why they think this, or why they think it’s relevant. They claim that “In many cases the historians are ignorant of the unique Vatican language sometimes using ancient Latin to express the hidden meaning of these requests.” Maybe the Vatican felt that Germany, the most cultured nation in Europe at the time, could not find someone versed in ancient Latin. The Vatican is a state, and had a network of prelates and diplomats in every theatre of war still intact at the end of WWII. It had a double-encryption process for diplomatic communication. Sure, they feared for the safety of the Vatican, the Roman curia and the pope, but they must have known Hitler would not be so stupid as to kill the pope. They had no need for obtuse language and cryptic, ambiguous messages, and in any case there was no place for ambiguity when confronted with the greatest crime in the history of Man.

    No, unfortunately the reality was different. The Foundation is wrong when it claims that to the Church “the terms non-Aryan Catholics, non-Aryans, and Catholic Jews all indeed meant Jews.” To the Nazis, who defined Jewishness as a trait inherited through blood, this was true. To the Church, who in the past had gone as far as kidnapping Jewish children who had been surreptitiously baptized and therefore had become irrevocably Catholics, those baptized Jews were no longer Jews but rather Catholics.

    Even if the true intent of Cardinal Pacelli had been to save Jews, and not just those who had converted to Catholicism, the reality is that most of the beneficiaries of the Catholic Church’s charity were the ebrei convertiti, that is, Catholics. Even when the Vatican made inquiries and complained about deportations of Jews, most of the times it wasn’t about Jews per se, but rather about “non-Aryan Catholics”. This referred to baptized converted Jews or, again, from a Catholic perspective, Catholics. In 1942 the Nazis decided to forcibly annul marriages between Aryans and non-Aryans. Since according to Catholic doctrine marriage is indissoluble, Cardinal Bertram wrote a letter in the name of the German episcopate to the Ministry of the Interior requesting that the ministry withdraw the planned divorce ordinance. Pope Pius XI had made a similar request of Mussolini. The Holy See made several other attempts to save Jews in mixed marriages, not because they were Jews, but because as opposed to the Nazis it considered those “non-Aryan Catholics” Catholics.

    After the deportation of the Jews of Rome, Vatican officials made inquiries about the whereabouts of the Jews, but most of these inquiries were about specific “baptized non-Aryan” individuals, however. The archbishop of Ferrara had asked the Holy See to intervene on behalf of “non-Aryans”, especially those in mixed families. The official reporting this in internal correspondence within the Vatican Secretariat of State went on to mention some potential actions the Holy See could take, knowing that they would be totally ineffective and they would fail. That request for help, however, was aimed at Jews in mixed marriages, and not Jews in general. With undisguised cynicism he showed no intention of intervening on behalf of the Jews, but rather was simply trying to preserve appearances by taking some token action he could report to the archbishop of Ferrara as well as future critics. He concluded: “if nothing else, it will always be possible to say that the Holy See has done everything possible to help these unhappy people.” This pattern was repeated many times, and as revealed by an internal Vatican memo, was intended to make it appear that the Vatican was working toward the goal of saving Jews. In reality, as the Jesuit Father Tacchi Venturi described these token actions, “A step like this by the Holy See, even if it does not obtain the desired effect, will without doubt help increase the veneration and gratitude toward the August Person of the Holy Father.” Which—not coincidentally—is exactly what we are seeing today with the work of papal apologists like Pave the Way Foundation.

    Gabriel Wilensky

    ————————————————————————————————–
    Author
    Six Million Crucifixions:
    How Christian Teachings About Jews Paved the Road to the Holocaust
    http://www.SixMillionCrucifixions.com
    Follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/sixmillionbook
    Become a Fan on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/SixMillionCrucifixions
    ————————————————————————————————–

  • Chet

    This seems like another “discovery” manufactured to prop up the canonization process. The claim of saving 200,000 lives, whether these Jews converted or not, is dishonest and impossible to prove.

    The Final Solution didn't begin until two and a half years after Kristallnacht. Prior to mid-1941, which was when the mass murdering began, Nazi policy was to make Germany free of Jews by expelling them. What the Vatican claims as heroic action taken in late 1938 was in fact happening with or without the Pope's assistance.

    What would the Vatican have us believe about the ultimate fate of the 200,000? Were they really saved? How many of them who ended up in other European countries were ultimatedly hunted down and murdered?

  • http://paulonpius.blogspot.com/ Paul O'Shea

    The key word in this whole article is “may”. Hesemann's claim does not bear close scrutiny. The term “non-Aryan” was a Nazi legal term that was also used in Vatican corresspondence with Germany (customary practice). Emigration from Germany was official Nazi policy for Jews until 1941. The documents described by Hesemann seem very similar to two documents published by theVatican in 1972 in Acts and Documents Volume 6, pages 48-50. Pacelli was acting on instructions from Pope Pius XII, not on his own – it would have been inappropriate for the Secretary of State to initiate actions of this magnitutde on his own. Besides, reading the text demonstrates this anyway.

    If this is the standard Pave The Way offers, we are in serious trouble. Hesemann's claims are spurious.