Wed 23rd Jul 2014 | Last updated: Wed 23rd Jul 2014 at 16:03pm

Facebook Logo Twitter Logo RSS Logo
Hot Topics

Latest News

Vatican: Pope’s words on condoms do not mark change in Church teaching

By on Wednesday, 22 December 2010

Pope Benedict with Cardinal William Levada, head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, at a meeting earlier this year (Photo: CNS)

Pope Benedict with Cardinal William Levada, head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, at a meeting earlier this year (Photo: CNS)

Pope Benedict XVI’s comments on condom use do not signify a change in the Church’s moral teaching or its pastoral practice, a note from the Vatican’s doctrinal congregation has said.

The note, released yesterday by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, said the Pope’s remarks do not represent a break with the Church’s doctrine on birth control, and cannot be construed to legitimise the use of condoms to prevent pregnancy.

It said that when Pope Benedict said condom use to reduce the risk of infection might be a first step toward moral awakening, he was referring specifically to prostitution, which is already considered gravely immoral by the Church.

In that situation, it said, use of a condom is not a “solution” because it does not address the mistaken behaviour that is the root cause of the problem. However, it added, “it cannot be denied that anyone who uses a condom in order to diminish the risk posed to another person is intending to reduce the evil connected with his or her immoral activity”.

The note was published following widespread discussion of Pope Benedict’s comments in a book-length interview, Light of the World: The Pope, the Church and the Signs of the Times.

The doctrinal congregation said the Pope’s words had in some cases been misunderstood, erroneously interpreted and manipulated to make it seem that his statement represented a break with the Church’s teaching against contraception.

In the book, the Pope was asked whether it was “madness to forbid a high-risk population to use condoms” in view of the Aids epidemic.

“There may be a basis in the case of some individuals, as perhaps when a male prostitute uses a condom, where this can be a first step in the direction of a moralisation, a first assumption of responsibility, on the way toward discovering an awareness that not everything is allowed and that one cannot do whatever one wants. But it is not really the way to deal with the evil of HIV infection. That can really lie only in a humanisation of sexuality,” the Pope said.

The doctrinal congregation’s note said it should be clear that the Pope “was talking neither about conjugal morality nor about the moral norm concerning contraception”.

“The idea that anyone could deduce from the words of Benedict XVI that it is somehow legitimate, in certain situations, to use condoms to avoid an unwanted pregnancy is completely arbitrary and is in no way justified either by his words or in his thought,” it said.

The note said the Pope was referring to “the completely different case of prostitution”, an immoral practice which has been made even more serious by the spread of HIV/Aids.

“Those who know themselves to be infected with HIV and who therefore run the risk of infecting others, apart from committing a sin against the Sixth Commandment are also committing a sin against the Fifth Commandment – because they are consciously putting the lives of others at risk through behaviour which has repercussions on public health,” it said.

The Pope’s affirmation that using a condom with the intent of reducing infection could be a “first step” toward moral awakening is clearly compatible with his previous statement that condoms are not the way to deal with the Aids epidemic, the note said.

Neither the doctrinal note nor the Pope’s book specifically addressed the situation of condom use by a married couple in which one spouse has HIV.

The doctrinal congregation said some have mistakenly interpreted the Pope’s words as an endorsement of the argument that, because of the lethal consequences of Aids, condom use may be tolerated as a “lesser evil”. It said the “lesser evil” theory is susceptible to “proportionalistic misinterpretation”.

“The Holy Father did not say – as some people have claimed – that prostitution with the use of a condom can be chosen as a lesser evil. The Church teaches that prostitution is immoral and should be shunned,” it said.

“However, those involved in prostitution who are HIV positive and who seek to diminish the risk of contagion by the use of a condom may be taking the first step in respecting the life of another – even if the evil of prostitution remains in all its gravity. This understanding is in full conformity with the moral theological tradition of the Church,” it said.

  • Pmangod

    Prostitution is condemned by God in the Good Book.

    Leviticus 19:29
    Make not thy daughter a common strumpet, lest the land be defiled, and filled with wickedness.

    Deuteronomy 23:18
    Thou shalt not offer the hire of a strumpet, nor the price of a dog, in the house of the Lord thy God, whatsoever it be that thou hast vowed: because both these are an abomination to the Lord thy God.

    Definition of Strumpet:

    strum·pet (strmpt)
    n.
    A woman prostitute

    [37] Keep all my precepts, and all my judgments, and do them. I am the Lord.

    The Pope needs to make this Word understood clearly to the world. There is no defense for not making this clear.

  • paulpriest

    John Thavis – you are a naughty boy!

    When you said “Neither the doctrinal note nor the Pope’s book specifically addressed the situation of condom use by a married couple in which one spouse has HIV.”

    …THAT IS NOT TRUE !!!

    What else does ““Those who know themselves to be infected with HIV and who therefore run the risk of infecting others, apart from committing a sin against the Sixth Commandment are also committing a sin against the Fifth Commandment…” mean ?

    I am getting somewhat irked at people imposing their own agenda on Catholic teaching while those in such devastating circumstances might follow the 'Ivereigh paradigm' – the bare-faced lie that 'The Church has yet to speak on the issue” – and thus Catholic hiv serodiscordant married couples might continue to engage in sexual activity [with a condom] and thus risk their spouse's health and life.

    Have you any possible notion what you're doing ?
    Your misrepresentation of Church teaching – CAN KILL!