Fri 24th Oct 2014 | Last updated: Thu 23rd Oct 2014 at 16:14pm

Facebook Logo Twitter Logo RSS Logo
Hot Topics

Latest News

Abortion doctor charged over eight deaths

By on Thursday, 20 January 2011

A Philadelphia doctor who routinely performed illegal late-term abortions for more than 30 years was charged in the death of a female patient and accused of murdering seven babies born alive in his squalid health clinic.

A grand jury indicted Kermit Gosnell and nine associates this week on dozens of charges in connection with the deaths of Karnamaya Mongar, 41, of Woodbridge, Virginia, and the newborn infants. The indictment said the babies were killed when their spinal cords were severed with scissors.

News of the practices in Gosnell’s West Philadelphia Women’s Medical Society prompted the Archdiocese of Philadelphia to offer “fervent prayers” for the victims, their families and all touched by “these heinous practices”.

The archdiocese said in a statement: “The repeated actions of Dr Gosnell and his staff were abhorrent and intrinsically evil in their disregard for the lives of the unborn and the welfare of the women who sought their services.

“We are prepared to assist with support services for the women who suffered these abortions and stand ready to provide proper burial at the appropriate time for the aborted babies,” the statement said.

At a news conference announcing the charges, District Attorney Seth Williams said the babies were born alive and viable.

Mr Williams said it was likely that hundreds of other babies died at the clinic between its opening in 1979 and February 2010, when federal agents served warrants at the location and Gosnell’s home in the Mantua neighborhood of West Philadelphia. He said evidence surrounding other likely deaths was missing, however.

The warrants were issued in connection with the illegal sale of prescriptions for Oxycontin to people never examined by Gosnell.

In the raid, FBI agents and detectives from the district attorney’s office discovered jars filled with severed baby feet lining the walls; containers, ranging from milk jugs to cat food receptacles, and bags containing aborted foetuses scattered throughout the clinic and bloodstained and urine-stained furniture and floors, Mr Williams said.

On-site staff members were also found to be unlicensed, he said.

In a 260-page report, the grand jury said authorities learned of Mongar’s November 2009 death from a staffer. Further investigation revealed that Mongar died from an overdose of anaesthetics prescribed by Gosnell, according to the report.

The grand jury called the clinic a “baby charnel house”.

The report contained vivid descriptions of procedures and graphic photos of dead infants.

It said the infant deaths involved children from 24 to 32 weeks gestation. Under Pennsylvania law, one of the strictest in the US, abortions past 24 weeks gestation are illegal. Most clinics decline to perform abortions past 12 weeks.

The Philadelphia Inquirer reported that Gosnell was well known for being willing to handle abortions for women whose pregnancies had surpassed 12 weeks and for treating poor and minority women.

Agents described the facility as “filthy”, “deplorable”, “disgusting” and “very unsanitary, very outdated, horrendous”, the report said.

“There was blood on the floor. A stench of urine filled the air. A flea-infested cat was wandering through the facility, and there were cat faeces on the stairs. Semi-conscious women scheduled for abortions were moaning in the waiting room or the recovery room, where they sat on dirty recliners covered with blood-stained blankets,” the report said.

Staff members face a slew of charges including murder, performing illegal abortions, conspiracy, racketeering, hindering prosecution, record tampering, obstructing justice, theft by deception, perjury and false testimony, and corruption of a minor.

Those indicted include Gosnell’s wife, Pearl, 49.

The grand jury also devoted a large part of its report to questioning how the workings of the Women’s Health Society could go undetected for so long and said that state and local agencies failed in their oversight and licensing duties.

“In the absence of any regulatory oversight, Gosnell recklessly cut corners, allowed patients to choose their medication based on ability to pay, and provided abysmal care – all to maximise his profit,” the grand jury said.

Jurors offered 15 recommendations for state and local governments to consider including legislative changes governing the statute of limitations for infanticide and illegal abortions as well as rules changes for agencies governing the work of abortion clinics and law enforcement agencies involving the investigation of suspicious deaths.

  • Kittymmm

    This is deplorable. However, is it also only the unmasked evil that we readily ignore within our society every day. To enable us to have unrestricted pleasure we are willing as a society to ignore and rationalise murder. Most will complain about the depravity of this case, but it only lifts the vineer on something we accept as a right within our society.

  • paulsays

    People obviously have many varying opinions on abortion, and for philosophers, theologans and the public alike may different conclusions have been come to. However regardless of what you think of it, it must be recognised that the Church takes a very hard line, in that it does not recognise abortion to save the life of the mother, and in that it characterises the embryo from conception as being akin to a child.
    That in fact killing an embryo is akin to killing a toddler.

    This view is shared by few who have looked at the biology and development of the feotus in the womb.

    I would like simply to point out the problem that such an absoultist view causes problems as can be seen in the recent story of a Catholic hospital in Arizona – that peformed an abortion on a woman that had a near 100% chance of death if one did not take place. The head of morals at the hospital, a nun, was then excommunicated from her local diocese. Now the story has gone futher and this hospital has been stripped of its connection with the Church entirely. The story can be found at the website of the national Catholic Reporter, I encourage those willing to put their views to the test to check it out at:

    also if you want a secular news source it has also been covered in the New York Times (below) and on other American news networks.

    Logically, the decision to do this to the nun makes no sense.
    Consider that in her situation she had three possibilities. Firstly she could have had the abortion performed, killing the foetus. Secondly she could have had the woman killed (!) saving the developing baby. Or thirdly, as presumably the Church would have wanted, she could have let them both die.
    Let me remind you the chance of death to the mother in this situation was close to 100%, she would not have been saved left alone. Make your choice…

  • Anonymous

    Further investigation revealed that Mongar died from an overdose of anaesthetics prescribed by Gosnell, according to the report.