Fri 24th Oct 2014 | Last updated: Fri 24th Oct 2014 at 18:39pm

Facebook Logo Twitter Logo RSS Logo
Hot Topics

Latest News

Down’s abortion figures may be higher, admits Government

By on Thursday, 17 January 2013

The Government recorded that 582 abortions were performed on unborn babies with Down's Syndrome in 2010 (Photo: PA)

The Government recorded that 582 abortions were performed on unborn babies with Down's Syndrome in 2010 (Photo: PA)

Hundreds more unborn children with Down’s Syndrome may be being aborted each year than official figures show, the Government has said.

The Government has said that it will investigate the annual number of abortions performed on babies with Down’s Syndrome after it emerged that the figures recorded by the Department of Health were significantly lower than the number recorded by the National Downs Syndrome Cytogenic Statistics’ (NDSCS) database.

After the discrepancy was brought to the department’s attention by this newspaper, a spokesman said: “We are aware that there is a potential discrepancy in figures and are looking into this in further detail.”

The discrepancy was first highlighted in the blog of Dr Peter Saunders, the head of the Christian Medical Fellowship, who pointed out that the Department of Health’s records state that in 2010 582 abortions were performed on unborn children with Down’s Syndrome while the NDSCS records that 942 unborn children with Down’s Syndrome were aborted in 2010.

Dr Saunders said: “Does this mean that doctors are knowingly falsifying abortion certification forms by neglecting to put down the true diagnosis for babies with congenital abnormalities? Or are they perhaps, possibly even deliberately, mis-classifying them as abortions on mental health grounds? Or are they just not bothering to report at all?

“Is this possibly even evidence of a failure of abortion reporting on a much greater scale? Might this be an under-reporting problem that goes much beyond babies with trisomy conditions?

“Might it actually be that only half of all abortions for any foetal abnormality are being reported? Is it even possible that this degree of under-reporting operates across other categories of abortion, perhaps even all categories? In other words might the Department of Health figures be grossly under-reporting the total number of abortions in England in Wales?”

He concluded: “Whatever the truth of the matter is, the disparities in the figures are alarming and need to be investigated urgently.”

  • Alba

    It amazes me that the same people who are up in arms about the abortion of females, frequntly don’t have a problem with the abortion of disabled babies. I suppose you could say that those who abort girls are following a kind of gruesome logic.

  • http://twitter.com/EcclesiaAdRem Francesco Forgione

    I wrote this a few days ago in which I mention the disparity in the number of births of people with Down’s Syndrome in this country in comparison to the statistics for Ireland where abortion is still illegal and that comparison would seem to bear this out.

    http://churchrelevant.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/alabama-declares-humans-to-be-people.html

  • http://www.facebook.com/laurence.england Laurence England

    Disgraceful. 

  • Rainworthryan

    Sorry, but an abortion is just that, an Abortion. On whatever, grounds. And sorry, again, you cannot “misclassify” an Abortion. And I would be surprised if any, Abortion carried out in this country, went unreported in medical notes. Its legal. Really, whats needed in the UK is a referendum on Abortion. And let the nation decide its own fate. I believe its murder, on-going culling up and down the land. And when we think about it,what did Jesus, want to use millstones for? And having just looked at 24 weeks gestation pics i wonder: “how could anyone kill them, they look fully human.?”