Protect the Pope was always feisty, either in defence of the Church against secularist attack, or against enemies of Catholic truth and discipline within the Church
Topic: Protect the Pope
Was Protect the Pope really divisive? Or was it rather those whom Deacon Nick believed were undermining the teachings of the Church?
Deacon ‘sad and disappointed’ at Lancaster decision
Fr Tim Finigan says Church leaders should not be using ‘personal standing to squash disagreement’ after blog controversy
A BMJ editorial is now saying that our law should pay less attention to the sanctity of human life, and that lives not worth living should be ended: what’s going on?
It’s also saying that brain-damaged and demented people just cost too much: what’s happened to medical ethics?
Did Archbishop Conti criticise Archbishop Nichols for denying that Christians are being persecuted? Maybe, maybe not: but he certainly disagrees with him
Our bishops should make it clearer that they are not trying to disassociate themselves from the Magisterium
But the campaign to defend them will, I hope, endure long after the visit is over
The priority is to start the fightback over child abuse
The Protect the Pope website seems to present Catholics as a ‘victim group’. But let’s keep our dignity, and not whine about our rights
A daily guide to what’s happening in the Catholic Church